ol

Hi, No doubt the course is fantastic with tons of information. I would suggest you to please include separate text files for more detailed information w.r.t that particular lesson as you have done before in the course of AWS Technical Essentials. It helps us review contents very fast when we need a revision.

great, but I think you need more to visualize it using a text since It's rather fast.

Por favor en ESPAÑOL.

Its nice

Good

NA

I am not so interested in the subject of this course as Python Software Engineer

I believe that the contents of this course could be really improved.

In the first course of specialization they use diagrams, walk-throughs with screen casts and labs, the second one is a talk-show with puppets and, for my taste a nauseating amount of management speak like "Through the use of trainings, deep dives into documentation, experimentation and innovation, and utilizing the readiness assessment process, you can work to keep all necessary actors and stakeholders at the same level." The humor and the desired level of "chattiness" are of course subjective, but there should be meticulous work to make the information clear and digestible. IMHO this is not the case. For instance, in the final assessment two questions is basically duplicated, with "X does: A B C D" and "Which service does A: X, Y, W, Z" and another question is "What is a benefit of X: it supports ONLY A, it supports ONLY B THE RIGHT ANSWER it does not support A" The difference between relocate, rehost and replatform is very subtle, but not explained. (I doubt that my understanding is 100% correct). There is a general impression that the topic was boring for the instructors, and they either tried to just reel off the services or to have some fun with puppets and jokes. P.S.: And there there is a "challenge" exercise where you have to have your own RDS instance and test Schema Conversion Tool and pay for it.

Most annoying voices in the video, really not pleasant to watch

sem hands on