RS
Dec 11, 2019
Great Course Overall
One thing is that some videos are not edited properly so Andrew repeats the same thing, again and again, other than that great and simple explanation of such complicated tasks.
OA
Sep 3, 2020
Great course. Easy to understand and with very synthetized information on the most relevant topics, even though some videos repeat information due to wrong edition, everything is still understandable.
By Akhtar H
•Apr 22, 2021
One of the best course of Deep Learning specialization. Excellent Material was prepared and delivered in great style of teaching.
By Peregrine D
•Oct 6, 2019
Overall great coverage of CNNs. Just think it's worth some more time getting dirty with the networks and building them with Keras.
By Alvaro S
•Jan 24, 2018
Triple loss correction is wrong.... Overall very good presentations and amazing content! Thanks for the opportunity to learn that.
By Estapraq M K
•Jul 9, 2018
It is great, but it had some problems in the some of the assignments submissions! Hope Coursera can fix it for the next students.
By Robert F
•May 24, 2021
Great presentation from Andrew Ng as usals. Sometimes a little too theoretical approach, some more concrete examples could help.
By Andrea
•Oct 9, 2019
The programming exercise of YOLO was not very clear, both the notation and the implementation. Otherwise, good couse. Thank you!
By Václav R
•May 2, 2019
Good introductory course. A bit more focus on transfer learning and using e.g. only a part of the networks would have been nice.
By xiaoquan h
•Jan 27, 2019
the content of course is quite good ,expecially the quiz and assignment.
But the server of programming assignment is quite slow.
By Aadesh N
•Nov 12, 2017
Excellent course with great materials. In my view, the difficulty of programming assignment needs to a bit harder that it is now
By Ryan L
•Jun 12, 2018
Great content but the slow speed and iffy stability of the jupyter notebooks makes the assignments a bit of a pain to complete.
By Alex
•Jan 1, 2018
Some bugs in grading will make you to waste 3-4 hours of time, which is frustrative. All except this is quite good and valuable
By Thành C V
•Nov 17, 2019
I really like this course. It gives me a huge of fundamental knowledge about CNN. Special Thank to PhD. Andrew Ng and mentors.
By Victor v d B
•Jan 14, 2018
Superb content, and a great course! Unfortunately issues with the assignments keeps this from a 5 star course when I took it.
By Galib M
•Feb 21, 2020
Thanks for another well organized course. It would be nice if there were more details about building and training the model.
By Jonathan H
•Aug 16, 2020
Good and very comprehensible, but does not go into depth. Particularly, homework assignments should give better practice...
By Tōnis S
•May 27, 2020
Great course. Maybe videos and assignments we not as good as in first three courses, but still very informative and useful.
By Shivam S
•Jul 2, 2019
Good Course but they should also teach how to implement transfer learning and how to load the dataset.
Anyway a good course.
By Gaetan J d B
•Jun 9, 2019
awesome content. some issues with assignments but nothing major...
Continuing on the next course, like them a lot! Txs guys.
By Thomas
•Jan 15, 2018
The course content is very interesting.
Only 4 stars because of the frustration due to the bugs in week 4 graded assignments
By Sekib O
•Dec 31, 2017
I have learned a lot but still don't feel confident when it comes to building CNN from scratch or choosing hyperparameters.
By Jörg P H
•Nov 24, 2017
great course again, but despite updated notebooks still some errors. Thanks to the community for communicating and sharing.
By Edward D
•Nov 20, 2017
The course is great, Andrew explains everything in CNN very clearly. But the assignment and grader really need some update.
By Dr M B N M
•May 26, 2020
Learnt CNN with practical examples. But it would have been good if tensor flow, keras part also might have been explained
By Ankur B
•Apr 8, 2020
Awesome course! I would highly recommend this to anyone who is an AI enthusiast specially in the field of computer vision.
By Adit S
•Nov 30, 2017
It would have gotten five stars, but grading problems and other technical difficulties on the backend were very prevalent.