Superdi

Good Job

Great

nice

Good

ve

Week 3 parts could be remade as they are not very clear. I had difficulty in understanding the accent of the instructor but the subtitles were great help. A good course with lots of resources and in-depth clarity of mostly all concepts.

Very good course with only theory. I recommend it.

Very Good

Good basic content but instructor hard to understand and the subtitles are not correct.

Needs updating of content and more recent examples.

The given information is overall good, but the user experience of the tests is very bad due to many coursera bugs

overall course consents are god but question and answer in quiz's are so disorderly.

Need a faster pace

I noticed that not a single person mentioned how poorly this course was written. There are numerous typos throughout the course: spelling mistakes, grammar mistakes, poor sentence structure, and so on. A few of the quizzes even have incorrect answers. I looked up Dr. Chow and I see that he earned his PhD way back in 1985 at the University of Texas, so why is his English still so poor? I mean no disrespect, but by now one would think that his English would be almost perfect. Even stating that, why didn't he have anyone proofread his writing and fix it? However, if someone else wrote the course, then why did he allow so many errors in the course? It's just mind-boggling. I'm here to learn, not to decipher broken English. I could understand if this course were from another country, but it's from the University of Colorado system, so the course should have been much better written. Anyway, I gave the course two stars, since despite the poor writing, there is useful information in it, otherwise it would be a one star class to me for sure.

Instructor is very knowledgeable and a very good expert in the field, but his accent is extremely heavy and unintelligible at times, making learning a bit hard. Turning on English subtitles will help, but even the subtitles are mislabeled due to the instructor's heavy accent. Also, the quizzes are broken - when you give a correct answer, the system will mark it as wrong at varying times times, while saying that you gave the correct answer (in red, losing you points). Very frustrating experience with the quizzes. Finally, the course probably needs updating, it seems to be 7 years old? Most of the videos it links to for study are from 2017 and earlier.

Very hard to understand, as well very boring. Test were all over the place as well thy were not aligned correctly

the language is the problem ....the course is very uninteractive .

poor lecturing