Back to Interactivity with JavaScript
Learner Reviews & Feedback for Interactivity with JavaScript by University of Michigan
7,226 ratings
About the Course
If you want to take your website to the next level, the ability to incorporate interactivity is a must. But adding some of these types of capabilities requires a stronger programming language than HTML5 or CSS3, and JavaScript can provide just what you need. With just a basic understanding of the language, you can create a page that will react to common events such as page loads, mouse clicks & movements, and even keyboard input.
This course will introduce you to the basics of the JavaScript language. We will cover concepts such as variables, looping, functions, and even a little bit about debugging tools. You will understand how the Document Object Model (DOM) is used by JavaScript to identify and modify specific parts of your page. After the course, learners will be able to react to DOM Events and dynamically alter the contents and style of their page. The class will culminate in a final project - the creation of an interactive HTML5 form that accepts and verifies input.
This can be completed as the third or fourth course in the Web Design For Everybody specialization.
Top reviews
JS
Invalid date
The methods learned throughout this course are useful when manipulating data; however, The videos could improve because a small portion of the videos are sometimes outdated, but totally valuable!
LC
Invalid date
An excellent course, my JavaScript has improved greatly since I completed the requirements. Colleen is a fantastic teacher, I found the lectures to be highly informative and the assignments good fun.
Filter by:
1451 - 1455 of 1,455 Reviews for Interactivity with JavaScript
By AyÅŸe N A
•Jul 25, 2017
It wasn't very helpful, I don't think the course was well-structured.
By Ritika V
•Jun 25, 2020
I m not interested to complete the course
By VIVEK K G
•Jan 29, 2022
peer grade not show completed
By Abe E
•Sep 3, 2020
no help no feedback nothing
By Ana B
•Jan 16, 2016
Very poor explanations.