I wish the quality of material would be better :(

find it too basic, even for an introductory course

Too short and too easy. But the teacher is good

It's a very nice course but it is very small.

I like it, but it´s a little bit boring

Um pouco razo demais para o marketing

A little heavy on the biology side

Demasiado largos los videos !

I cannot find my certificate?

nessun attestato

Not particularly engaging. Some significant overlaps in content on the videos. Some rambling videos that could really do with editing. I liked that the content within the main lecture was concise - it really needed to be because the lecturer has very little variety to his tone of speech - listening requires "high cognitive load". Don't want to be too down on it because I really appreciate the free content and the subject material is very interesting, but it could do with a bit more love and the practical application of the marketing concepts described in the course. Maybe start with some eye-tracking on someone completing the course?!

It was generally a little too easy for me, but I guess that's my problem for not choosing the right level. What I expected was more of 'why' and 'how' on a certain result, so that I can expand upon my current knowledge on neuroscience, drawing connection between neuroscience and business (marketing). Rather, most of the lessons were more like "they did this and found that", without much fundamental explanation. Nevertheless, I believe the lessons will be very informative and useful for most people who do not have much basis on neuroscience.

Many lectures were very repetitive. I don't know how many times the Pepsi-Cola challenge was mentioned during the first few weeks of the course. The interviews could have been edited better to include to only include the key messages. Week 1 to 5 were not really for neuroscientists for sure. They are too basic. I can see if you have no background in brain biology, this could be a reasonable good intro to decision making in neuroscience. Week 6 was interesting from ethical and legal point of view.

The topic is very interesting and the instructor very knowledgeable. The interviews are also quite helpful. Unfortunately the course is not seamlessly delivered, seems rather that they have used 1:1 existing videos which are not well connected. There are also some technical problems (e.g. the video / sound quality of some of the interviews - esp. week 4 is not good). Also the reading materials are scientific publications which are not easy to read and the "so what" element is missing.

A lot could be improved, the video quality was bad, meaning the slides were almost impossible to read, and for one of the review questions there was no correct answer, all of them came up as false. Many people seem to have pointed it out in the forum for months, but nothing has been done about it

A lot of fluff, and a lack of real structure or direction. From a marketing perspective, I didn't find it particularly informative or insightful. Perhaps it's just really dated now. I think the same insights are communicated far more effectively in other courses I'd done and books I've read.

Alot of the course is taken up by heavy reading material, lectures are often breif wheras interviews are long and often with sub-par audio. The course overall is a decent introduction but it could be polished to become a better learning experience.

wished it was more marketing-centric that could be commercially applied and less focussed on technical scientific knowledge.

The interviews weren't great and the video 2 in the final assignment didn't load

Instructor's pronunciation is sometimes unclear and videos are a bit tedious

For me personally: way to complex and brain rather than output focused

It´s good but you don´t feel the energy and gets a little bit boring

The videos are too long and they just "speak" not teach.

The delivery of the material was EXTREMELY DULL.

Very superficial and dry