i like the learning experience with questions throw the course. There are some error in some questions. Some true/false questions have only one option to select with a feedback hints.

The information has been comprehensive. The only minor thing I find least enjoyable is the presenter reading information from the slide.

Course is designed in a proper manner with quiz to evaluate understanding on the topic

Challenging course, what every project manager needs for improved performance.

very good content, easy to applied in my workplace

Good basic understanding of the Six Sigma process.

Very Informative and interacting course

Minor errors in some module quizzes.

Great content. With real exams

great course

typos.

good

nice

Lots of typos and grammatical errors. I made a lot of mistakes until I read along with the videos. Needs someone to go through and do a good proofreading. Other than that, it seemed like there were good points to be made and learned. Occasionally, there were areas that seemed confusing - I would've liked more examples of the different analysis methods.

The course is so mechanic, even the voices are digital and the shouting instructor follows the slides only.

We need to have a source for revesion or if the slides where available to revise from it.

Mechanical presentation and reading of slides. A bit dry.

I am sorry to give a not great rating as I can tell they put a lot of work into this course. However, it was incredibly dry and difficult to follow. There were not enough examples provided when reviewing complex concepts. It's like they were reading the glossary of a textbook instead of demonstrating the material in an engaging and memorable way. I ended up using the syllabus as a guide of videos to look up on YouTube. Found way better examples and demonstrations of the material this course was meant to cover. Kinda a bummer.

Correct but not very impressive course.

Content is right and complete, but delivery is uneven: some modules (eg 3 and onwards) are basically reading out loud a series of often not connected phrases, without a proper flow.

Not the best course from this University. I hope the rest of the specialization is of a higher standard.

The final test is *heinously* bad. The content is confusing/ambiguous, and the quiz looks like it was written as an afterthought by some random person contracted to formulate answers. This was a terrible experience for the first unit of a rather-significant certification.

The material is not so engaging, i would prefer to see an instructor talking about the theme. Also, the questions during the course sometimes are unbiguous. I thing it should be more interactive as wel..

Fairly general, brief, and generic introduction to strategy and organization. Briefly discusses lean 6 sigma.

The grading system is flawed. The peer reviews by novices are mandatory instead of optional. Grade and completion is dependant upon novices grading assignments. The forced social interaction is a business move to monetize the social networking within the platform. How can a novice student be allowed to pass or fail a project when they are not qualified to teach it. There is no educational value when graded by unqualified persons with zero experience. This should be eliminated. This is cause for invalidating our achievements with employers due to this lazy grading system. Educators are passing their duties unto the student to avoid the work they are supposed to perform. No oversight in these 'Peer Reviewed" assignments. I will only participate in Peer review assignments if they have Zero impact on our grades. This is not a legitimately approved grading system.

The presentation of the material and the material itself is terribly structured and presented. Tests do not check your understanding of the topic, but how well you have learned the text of the lecture, and sometimes without context, the question does not make any sense or have a clear answer. Didn't get any enjoyment from the course and no practical knowledge accordingly.

I am very disappointed by the quality of the lecture delivery. I had to study books and other lessons to understand it fully. I did more self-study to understand each aspect of the syllabus and merely depended on the modules. The money isn't worth it at all.