Chevron Left
Back to 营养与健康

Learner Reviews & Feedback for 营养与健康 by Nanjing University

4.3
stars
141 ratings

About the Course

《营养与健康》介绍营养学基础知识,主要内容包括:人体所需的七大营养素的化学结构、主要生理功能、食物来源、人体每天的参考摄入量等;主要食物种类包括谷物类、薯类、豆类、坚果类、蔬菜类、水果类、肉类、水产品类、蛋类、乳制品类的营养价值;营养与疾病特别是一些慢性、高发性疾病如高血糖、高血脂、高血压、癌症等的关系。内容简单,适合无营养学基础、但希望了解一般的营养学知识,改善日常膳食质量的人选修。...
Filter by:

26 - 50 of 51 Reviews for 营养与健康

By TUNG C H

Oct 31, 2015

Good. i had learn a lot of things in this course. Thank you Coursera for providing this course.

By kanghua z

Nov 20, 2015

课程很严谨,知识量丰富,但是基本都是概念的东西,吸收起来比较困难,希望老师能把这门课上的更生活话,比如举例子,让学生的大脑动起来,太概念的东西大脑记完很容易遗忘

By Hanson Z

Jul 31, 2016

干货满满,但是教学设计可以提高,以适应成人学习的规律

By TC C

Apr 6, 2021

Note and video not match

By Joyce S

Oct 23, 2020

some chapter is missing

By 李雋凱

Sep 20, 2017

課程内容獲益良多。讚

By 云终韵

May 4, 2019

有些问题答案有错误

By Ruijia W

Jan 28, 2019

Some of the knowledge may be out-of-date:

1. instead of BMI - body fat percentage, a recently more popular and reasonable measurement of health status - is not even mentioned in this course. In addition, it is believed that fat is distributed almost evenly in human body, thus the classification of "apple"/"pear" kind of fat are nonprofessional.

2: 胆固醇 - cholesterol is no longer a concern in diet as human body produce much more than we take from food. (https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/cholesterol-food-1.3394391; Cholesterol is not a nutrient of concern for overconsumption," the guideline now reads.)

Last, there are many detailed chemical expressions in the power points - not saying they are wrong - but I suspect any student will take note or memorize them. Therefore, less is more - replacing them with figures + a few bullet points of functions may improve efficiency.

General logic arrangement and content of this course is great, despite the old fashion lay-out and knowledge pieces.

By 王斯达

Aug 26, 2015

课程中对营养素的摄入以及不同食物的营养价值的介绍非常有帮助,比如蛋白质的摄入跟其模式有关,而不仅仅与其氨基酸的含量有关,而禽类的营养价值比畜类要高;

一些常识也非常有用,比如体重指数BMI的计算,而且肥胖不仅仅要看BMI,还要看腰围;

不足之处是很多东西过于教科书化,比如人体每天摄入量的计算,各种维生素的作用等等,由于本人学习课程的目的更多是为了日常的实用性,所以建议不妨多加一些例子分析,让课程内容更加生动。

最后非常感谢郑老师的认真教学,谢谢您!

By Shao J

Sep 26, 2015

The course gives an general theoretical overview about nutrition, but not goes further into details or practical example.

By 姚瑶

Feb 4, 2016

看了很多中国和国外的营养课程视频,发现中国老师大多是按部就班地讲课,比较死板,不容易理解和记忆。国外的课程比较生动,会结合政治、心理、社会等等以及引用大量的实例结合课程,比较容易记忆和理解。

By Randolph L

Jun 2, 2017

怎么说呢,考试的课程对我而言的确是有些帮助的,但可能是课时限制的问题,感觉很多膳食营养的问题都没有提到,有些地方的专业名字又太过深奥,总体接纳的水平一般。

By liki_ y

Nov 28, 2022

课程设计不合理应该修改一下题目顺序 有些题目 是还没学过下一周的内容 b和d大概是烟酸那节吧(好像)和维生素d的字幕视频混了 其他都还好 谢谢老师

By sophie w

Aug 20, 2020

课程是好东西,但是考试和课程不同步,又题太多。

By Longfei J

Oct 6, 2021

照本宣科,理论太多,实际内容过少

By Sun Y

Oct 4, 2015

Some of the knowledge is useful in life. But they are not integrated well. They let you feel that they are just knowledge but you can hardly connect them with food, with daily life or with your health. The good knowledge teaching should be like how much calorie we need per day? how much food equal to 1000 calories? What is the good sample for eating or cooking? Knowledge is not only formula. This course is not that interesting. But, thanks for the teacher all the same.

By Cindy L

Feb 1, 2022

维生素的课程有几个严重错误,一个视频的脚本缺失,视频内容和脚本张冠李戴,导致一个章节没有视频讲解…有些作业答案与课程所教的对不上…老师的视频就是照本宣科很枯燥乏味……这课程放到十五二十年前可行,到了2022年实在跟不上时代了。2个星星给花时间制作的老师和其他人员

By Deleted A

Apr 3, 2021

常识科普型课程,课程设计和课后作业多有偏差之处;不更新也不改正,不推荐此课程

By 阿ben

Sep 16, 2021

内容乏善可陈,错漏百出。

By Cynthia C

Jan 30, 2024

Week three, there are some video not provide, cannot finished the programme and quiz

By Kate S

Feb 24, 2021

老师就是一个没有感情的念PPT机器。课程内容也不完全,script和视频对应不上。课后答案有些地方都是错的。不推荐上,上了只会更疑惑

By Sofia A A P

Nov 23, 2015

No hay subtítulos en inglés ni español

By Sidra I

Sep 30, 2023

english subtitle is not available.

By 高啟峰

Jul 7, 2020

亂七八糟