grt IBM

Brutal

Best!

great

Bueno

GREAT

good

....

good

good

good

Good

good

good

top

Ok

t

Pretty good course. The labs are awesome, they really helps, especially for people like me who are strong at hands on. The course videos were ok, lot of theory which goes in one ear and out the other, but might just be me because I'm weak at listening/watching and learning.

I really don't like the peer review system, because people who don't understand your code just give 0 marks, some just give 0 marks anyway. Maybe I got lucky but on this course didn't suffer to much with that.

This was actually a fun course, despite the labs being down from a long maintenance, which is why I took a star off. Unlike the other courses in the IBM Cloud Full-Stack Developer certification, this course does not require complete use of their online environments. The assignment also provides a lot more flexibility than assignments in the other courses.

I did like that I had to write some code for this. I do wish for the Peer Reviews that you could click on the attached screenshots so that you could read the small text easier. I was able to zoom out the browser window so I could read and confirm student screenshots, but I think this might be able to be improved.

Course is good, leaned a lot from it, super recommend! My only comment that, although is perfectly developed for doing the labs on the lab environment, it could be better prepared for those doing the labs on our own computer instead of the lab environment. Other than that, its great!

Good course, especially the labs (although some typos here and there). The videos are sometimes hard to digest and remember the content. But overall course coverage is good and useful, especially for just 3 modules.

Muestran de manera basica y no tan pesada la forma de desarrollar aplicaciones usando flask, me hubiera gustado ver mas a fondo las librerias de watson pero de igual manera esta muy bien

A bit harder labs, and final project where not everything was copy and paste. Only downside was that pre-loaded .js was mixed in coding standard, which made for some confusions...