LS
Nov 27, 2018
The course with the IBM Lab is a very good way to learn and practice. The tools we've learned in this module can supply a good material to enrich all data work that need to be presented in a nice way.
CJ
Apr 22, 2023
Learnt a lot from this visualization course. The one I found most interesting was making the dashboard. Although sometime the code and indentation are tedious, but this might be useful in the future.
By VIGNESHKUMAR R
•Dec 25, 2019
Need to improve more please
By Marina H
•Nov 19, 2019
Some code did't work in Labs
By Zhivko Z
•Dec 4, 2022
Very badly designed course
By Biswa B
•May 18, 2021
I didn't like this course.
By Anmol P
•Nov 6, 2019
More content and examples
By Em
•Oct 29, 2019
The labs are very buggy.
By Naman S
•Apr 17, 2020
Could have been better
By YIFAN H
•Oct 7, 2019
好多东西根本没说啊,然后就要做作业,一脸懵逼
By Mark P
•Sep 18, 2019
JSON links are broken.
By 4004_Musfiqul A
•Feb 18, 2020
Need more hand notes
By Mateusz K
•Sep 20, 2024
carelessly prepared
By pranav s
•May 15, 2020
I found it boring
By Adil J
•Jul 1, 2019
Can be better
By Mix U T
•May 17, 2020
course is ok
By Gloria S
•Aug 15, 2019
too basic
By Fabio B
•Mar 15, 2019
Too basic
By Vu C T
•Sep 22, 2021
By Steven B
•Nov 13, 2024
Pros: The labs were pretty good, particularly the early ones that used the Jupyter notebook, and those were the main way that I learned from this course. Cons: The video lectures were not at all engaging and didn't seem very necessary, and I just skimmed the transcript or skipped them entirely. Often there felt like a lack of alignment between the videos and labs and between the different modules, as if different people had put each of them together and hadn't coordinated well with each other. The later labs, on Dash, were not as good as the earlier ones - it's a cool system, but perhaps it was just too complex for this course - I felt like all I did was fill in a few blanks and didn't really understand it. But the biggest issue is that the assessments were poor. The multiple choice assessments at the end of each module were pretty useless - most questions were trivial, a few obscure, but almost none effectively tested either programming skills or conceptual understanding. The final project for this particular course was also not very good. It involved a large number of poorly defined tasks, supplemented with copious hints that did almost all the work for you, supplying you with almost complete that only required you to fill in a few words. To have actually figured out the tasks by myself would have been very laborious, if not impossible due to the lack of specificity in the instructions. But using the supplied code transformed it into merely an exercise in careful copying and pasting, and I don't feel like I learned that much.
By Matt N
•Dec 30, 2021
There is a section of the videos about 1.5 minutes long where you have to listen to "Now lets process the data frame so the country name becomes the index of each row. This should make retrieving rows pertaining to specific countries a lot easier. Also lets add an extra column that represents the cumulative sum of annual immigration, from each country, from 1980 to 2013. So for Afghanistan for example it is 58639 total, and for Albania it is 15699 and so on. And lets name our data frame DF_Canada".....
This replays in each of the what 10-12 videos or so... It adds no value whatsoever because its just saying that same thing without actually showing how we accomplished that. So its a loop about half the size of each video with non-pertinent information. Fast forward to week 4 and we suddenly jump into Dash. I found Dash to be very interesting, but the learning curve was steep since we didnt really discuss Dash in any of the videos. You are learning it purely off the workshops which uses an IBE that we do not use in any of the other courses in the Data Analyst Certification series.... I would recomend adding value content to the videos and not relying as heavily on the self directed labs to do the training for this course.
By Ian R
•Feb 18, 2021
This course needs some significant remodeling in order for users to feel like they learned something from this course. I couldn't finish the final assignment because visually speaking, it was so hard to follow. Furthermore, the final assignment was creating a dashboard, which covered Week 4. There was no graded assignment that covered Weeks 1-3. Luckily, that material was easy to follow. Not sure what the point of having the material for Weeks 1-3 is if we are not going to be tested on this material via a final assignment.
To make this course more worthwhile, I think there should be a graded peer review assignment for Weeks 1-3, so learners have a chance to test their knowledge on this material. Then have an assignment that addresses dashboards. I also think it would be easier the dashboard assignment in IBM Watson Studio.
By Soubir D
•May 1, 2021
I spent more time trying to fix "localhost refused to connect" and other errors from the end of course management, while submitting my final assignment, than on doing the actual course or assignment - it's not a very efficient way to test a newbie like me who isn't familiar with these various environments.
Also, when there's no instructor speaking to you and it's just robotic voice and text, it doesn't feel much like an educational course and is off-putting. The lectures were also way too short and flew through concepts too quickly. The only mitigating factor was the labs which were decent and the only thing that actually aided my learning rather than being a hindrance. I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but I'm unsubscribing from this course. Thanks anyway.
By THOMAS L
•Feb 24, 2023
This course touches some very interesting topics and tries to cover many aspects of Data Visualization. That said the videos do not explain anything in depth, most of them are just 3 minutes presentations of the same code that will be explained in the labs wasting another 2 minutes just to do THE SAME dataset formatting IN EACH VIDEO! The labs are interesting however you have to read and understand a lot ON YOUR OWN, most parameters are not explained (of course you can just copy paste the examples to pass the labs) and if you really want to learn you have to study most of the material on the websites and tutorials of the various tools that are used in the course e.g. matplotlib, Plotly, Dash etc. So I don't really understand what you need this course for.
By Cynthia J
•Jul 27, 2021
El curso esta descripto como nivel intermedio, sin embargo, las primeras dos semanas se tratan plots basicos (ej. boxplot, pie chart, scatter, etc) pero no se profundiza muchos sobre las opciones de parametros a ajustar ni como mejorar la parte estetica, y la practica solo da un pantallasmo muy general. Yo en mi caso buscaba conocimientos algo mas avanzados sobre estos graficos.
La seccion de dash, si bien yo no la conocia y estuvo interesante, fue poco clara la explicacion, una practica completa pero como que me falto mas base y explicacion de los diferentes modulos para poder llevarla a cabo. Al final no me quedo muy claro como se deberia armar el archivo para dashnoard ni que rol cumple cada parte.
By Abu S N
•May 2, 2021
I would give 2 stars for the materials taught prior to 5th week's final project. It goes downhill from there. The final project is atrocious. The assignment does not run in the suggested platform (e.g., Jupyter notebook, Watson, or Skills Network - the latter has been malfunctioning for couple of weeks now). I had to run the project in Google Colab to get the output. Most of the students are facing the same problem. Ans yet, neither the instructors nor IBM staff provide any workable solution. Furthermore, the instructions given does not match with the output generated in the lab (e.g., only one upload 'space' for uploading multiple plots). Terrible experience for most participants.