I observed mistakes here and there, there are no proper instructions. instructors don't answer in the forums. you will have your questions unanswered fro weeks. course content could be much better.

The beginning of this course was pretty solid, but it got progressively more shallow as the course went on. I'm disappointed because I feel like the more advanced topics were kind of glossed over.

Sir, Mainly I was looking for NUMPY and PANDAS but I could not find that much content in the same. After completing this course I am not able to remember and apply pandas and NumPy any library.

I like the choice of topics, makes sense from the beginning.

However the labs are too easy and repetetive, would be prefer to have to write the code myself based on what I learned in the videos.

There are not many useful information in this course because for example, there are much more numpy and padnas use cases but there are only two or three methods I could learn from this course.

In the course the basics of python are explained well. However, there are barely any assignments where you really need to work with data yourself. Even the last assigment doesn't ask for lot.

It went way too fast and didn't explain any conventions. I have a year of python experience and some of this even went too fast for me. It does, however, have a load of useful information!

Last weeks included far to little actual programming exercises. You only learn programming by doing it and going trough alot of demos is good but not a substitute for actual programming.

The course content was good but it was overwhelming for the beginners like me. The video presentation was good and easy to understand but programs in hands-on-lab were difficult to solve.

When you are a novice it can be quite confusing to get what is happening. The explanations are quick and brief, sometimes leaving you wondering how you are supposed to do the assignments.

The course is fast paced with so less practical and interaction. It can improve by diving a little deeper in each sub-topics and making it better through effective use of the laboratory.

Good course, but did not prepare you for the potential errors encountered in the last question of the peer-reviewed assignment. This seems to be a trend based on the discussion forum.

I had to go find other resources to better explain the content. Issues and unable to sign up for IBM Watson Studio which is part of the hands-on lab and integral to learning concepts.

In week 3 The Function Chapter needs more examples and easy to understand version. The quiz is quite simple compared to the theories. I am not satisfied with the Functions in Python.

Some of the examples were broken and the watson links were outdated. Watson has been updated but the training does not reflect it.

Otherwise, good content and I did learn some stuff.

Good overview and intro to python. Though many many errors in the voice track and course material. Seems very sloppy and out of date. But content was good and thoroughly explained.

The course's content is excellent, but the presentation is terrible, and several of the labs and quizzes are far too simple. The final Python Class lab, nevertheless, was excellent!

I see that much more applications or quizzes on the syntax of libraries and programming languages must be attached to the course in order not to forget what we learned from videos

Overall, I learned a lot from the labs and videos.

The organization of the material taught could be better.

There were some parts in the lab where the materials were very sloppy.

IBM Watson has changed it's layout a bit. There is confusion regarding a part of lab assignment so it becomes cumbersome to look at solution and still not being able to solve it.

the course objective not clear, a lot of information not discussed deeply during the course as an overview but in fact it took a long time to understand specially for beginners.

I think this course in lacking explanations for some methods & code lines that are used in the skill labs.

In addition some of the questions in the final test are very low level.

Good material, but very poorly designed final Assignment, especially, people are using the links that other students' worked out before. Hope this can be improved in the future.

the programming task for the exam was not clear had some issues. For example it did not say you had to shift enter the one section so you would not get errors during the graph.

The content in the first 4 weeks was great and suitable for my current level in programming. However, week 5 was full of very advanced topics that I couldn't understand well.