A very interesting course with lots of information. The translations were at times a little challenging.

This course has really sparked my interest in archaeolog. I would like to take it to the next level.

A very interesting course which contributed further to my little knowledge on the island of Motya.

Muy interesante y útil, aunque un poco confusas algunas explicaciones y preguntas de los test

It is a very interesting course to know the Phoenician city of Motya.

was well paced would have liked a little more history

My first try at a subject like this. Very well done.

5/5 Lorenzo Nigro

4/5 content

3/5 translation

All concepts are not from Europe.

interesting story of archaeology

T

Fascinating topic, and Professor Nigro was inspirational in his enthusiasm and professionalism. But those transcripts!! No sign of having been proof-read, let alone edited! So many instances of [INAUDIBLE] or [FOREIGN]; words spelt so incorrectly that the meaning was unclear - for example, the course discussed the Phoenician settlement of Motya, but there were at least 5 different spellings of this name; the names of the various pottery types were impossible to decipher. Professor Nigro's accent was a bit tricky, but his enthusiasm made up for that. Yes, I know you have to use a computerised tool to produce these transcripts, but surely someone could take a bit of time to proof-read? What the computer produced was a complete mess, an insult both to learners, and a betrayal of Professor Nigro's professionalism. I would have given 5 stars had the transcripts been better.

I enjoyed the course, however, some of the most important details presented in this course were completely wrong. The greek god Poseidon is not and never will be Baal. Baal can be compared to Hades from the realms of the underworld and death. I would have expected more from a so called professor of Archaeology.

The pictures of the artifacts, the maps and views of the site are all excellent. I found it challenging at times to get the jest of what was being said. Never the less I enjoyed the history lesson.

Good contents once you learn to decode Lorenzo's accent and limited English abilities. Exams could use a good proof reading from someone who is better in English.

The course is very interesting, but the instructor really speaks a very poor English and sometimes it is not easy to understand what he is saying.

Very interesting course.

However, the image of the symbol of Sapienza Università di Roma is broken. PLEASE FIX THAT.

Aimed at experienced archaeology students who want a deep-dive into this one particular topic.

Interesting contents, flimsy presentation with sometimes a confusing use of English language.

The videos are excellent but the choice of lectures and the quiz need more work.

Pro: - Some facts presented are interesting.

Cons: - Most content is too related about a specific dig find, too few general context.

-Prof has strong accent and English subtitles were *extremely* bad (did a machine do that???).

-Video cutting and script felt done overnight: some bad cuts, some segments are repeated on several occasions in the video

-Female students shouldn't be treated as decorations!

The instructor's English was difficult to understand at times. The written text regarding the spoken had many errors

It is impossible to withdraw from a this course!!!!!!