Chevron Left
Back to Designing for User Experience

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Designing for User Experience by Microsoft

4.6
stars
39 ratings

About the Course

In this course, learners will analyze user needs and research and use those insights to make design choices. They will review design ideation techniques and use Design Thinking to generate create storyboards, user flow diagrams, and journey maps. Last, they will use information architecture principles to organize content for intuitive navigation....

Top reviews

Filter by:

1 - 9 of 9 Reviews for Designing for User Experience

By leonsholo

•

Jul 26, 2024

This is a well-structured course that explains the information so well it feels natural. I love the insights it gives me to hone my understanding on UX even better. I'm learning more than I've learnt in my professional experience.

By Nana A A A

•

Nov 26, 2024

This course was great, very interesting and easy to understand. I have gained valuable insights for my career.

By Deleted A

•

Oct 19, 2024

Great platform to learn.

By Ichsan G

•

Sep 4, 2024

Nice Course for beginer

By Mohamed R

•

Jul 14, 2024

Amazing a lot of skills

By Alex G

•

Oct 14, 2024

Some of the narrative is confusing, often duplicated and the examples used with some more important practical assignments do not fully resemble or pose as a good visual explanation of said assignment. I did however, learn a lot of new stuff and feel more confident in building up from ground zero for UX Design

By yuri n

•

Nov 10, 2024

I discovered multiple principles and theories that can be applicable to my career path as UI /UX Designer. However, through my journey, the modules and chapters have becoming more tedious and redundant to learn.

By Casai H

•

Aug 25, 2024

This course is not as interactive and hands on as I thought it would be. It is filled with lectures in quizzes not a lot of grading assignments which would be beneficial I thought this course would be comparable to the Google UX course

By Monica D

•

Dec 6, 2024

Questions were poorly written and concepts didn't seem to relate to each other in coherent way.