Learner Reviews & Feedback for How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course) by École Polytechnique
About the Course
Top reviews
TD
Nov 20, 2021
I really liked the course and the contents are great. Except for the language problem, everything else is very good, and really enjoyed learning from peers and instructors. Thank you for the platform.
SM
Apr 11, 2020
The content was very good and explanation was excellent just there was a slight problem with instructors accent but don't worry you will get used to it no time but the course is excellent and helpful
901 - 925 of 934 Reviews for How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper (Project-Centered Course)
By Ar S S u R
•May 8, 2020
INITIAL PEER GRADING WAS NOT VERY MATURE ENOUGH IN GRADING MY ASSIGNMENT SERIOUSLY..
By Carlos R S J
•Apr 5, 2016
It is good, but there is a student speaking that is really difficult to understand.
By karuppuchamy.v
•Apr 27, 2020
Exteremely good course for those who r doing research ....Thanks to whole Team.
By Waheed A
•Mar 15, 2023
This in an amazing course, lot of new things learn from this fruitful course
By Joseph V B B
•Jul 8, 2020
It is very good for undergraduate students starting their research projects
By Debyani R
•May 7, 2020
Please make it easier to understand the peer-grade assignment and process.
By PRASHANT S R
•Sep 27, 2024
Can be improved further. Not very useful. Content is not so good.
By Derrick G
•Jan 26, 2020
not very useful because there are few examples of it.
By Wisam A W
•Sep 12, 2017
A good summary on how to start thinking research!
By David E F G
•Jun 23, 2020
The grading is a mess. The content is good.
By Vincentius A B
•Jun 8, 2020
Somewhat not really practical
By Olga T
•Apr 17, 2017
Very basic
By AMR M
•Oct 20, 2022
nice
By Ravindra M
•May 25, 2020
good
By Mohsan U A
•May 1, 2020
Good
By Ranakishore P
•Apr 24, 2020
Good
By Prodromos V
•Apr 25, 2022
Too basic, especially when considering "it was written from PhD students for PhD students". The course lacks substance and the advice is too general and intuitive (for master of PhD students which of course as mentioned is the targeted audience of this course). I would much rather recommend "Writing in the Sciences" - this is what this course should have been (however note that that writing in the sciences is teaches principles through medical articles).
By Ahura N
•May 18, 2023
I didn't find what In was looking for in this course and I have changed my mind about finishing it, the title indicates that I am going to get detailed education on writing an essay but the content is only about general definitions in this area. If you as a reader are interested in a course for re ally learning how to get better in writing your essays I recommend taking the " Getting Started with Essay Writing" course.
By Zandro A
•Jun 22, 2020
I higly recommend to revise the scoring rubrics for the assignment -checklist. I dont see it fare to give between 75 and 100 for the score to the fact that we made an effort doing the checklist better to other options such as 80 or 85 orchange the checlist instead since wehave different style in making a checklist. Thanks and more power still a good and interesting course
By Cihan K
•Jun 24, 2023
It was difficult to understand some video lessons due to the pronunciation of the words. It shouldn't be so hard to re-record when you do not pronounce a word properly. I was expecting that this course would be better
By Ghadeer
•Dec 24, 2020
A laughable course and very poorly prepared, almost a complete waste of time if not for the final exercise
By Adlirrahman A M
•Jul 23, 2020
The course is great but the peer reviews by other participant are horrible
By abood
•Jul 3, 2023
not very helpful for me as a medical student i expected better than that
By ABDULLAH B
•Oct 13, 2020
Excellent course for PHD students only.
By Liesbeth V
•Oct 3, 2024
Something I found good about this course were the interviews, it was very helpful. But this was maybe the only helpful thing. They talk about the important of proper written English but I think proper spoken English and good articulation and pronunciation are important. Often the articulation was so bad that the transcript generator didn't even understand or understood incorrectly. On the content: there was a lot of repetition and they didn't go into much detail on how to actually write and publish a manuscript. On top of that where the references outdated. This course was definitely not worth the money I spent. A better course that goes into more detail and gives you actually helpful insights is the Writing in the Sciences Course (Stanford).