basic

GOOD

good

good

ok

ok

.

The video is great, and the lady is amazing, however, this material is too sophisticated, please divide the material into several videos, I am an expert and could not handle it very well.

video changed midway. audio is missing for a big part. She is talking something else and the screen says something else.

Very basic, somewhat inaccurate representation of some of the challenges of working with LLMs and GenAI

Didn't like the way it been explained! the tutor was fast and not easy to follow

Interesting but she talks way to fast

very basic. not very useful.

It is very well

Too simple

bueno

good

The presenter spoke too rapidly -- she ran words together and often mumbled; non-native English speakers *will* have difficulty understanding her. Google should have supplied a better speaker or hired a professional speaker to do this kind of work! Within two or three minutes, I gave up on listening to the presenter and read the printed text -- much more valuable! Despite the general content being more-or-less at the novice level, there were more than just a few jargon words/terms used that were not explained.

Gave a good intro, but, god, don't make the video tutorials like this please. All i see is that lady in the tutorial, its so distracting. Multiple angles of her face and several zoom shots. Who is interested in her, please show on screen content, she is blabbering fast, i just had to slow down the speed so much and pause and go back several hundred times to understand what is going on.

The subject matter scratched the surface of the subject, but somehow was unsatisfactory. The test is completely bogus. It doesn't test your knowledge, but tests your ability to "spot the difference" between answers that look 99% the same and have one or two words different. Super annoying.

A lot of useful information but without detailed explanation and clear understanding how and why things are connected / following each other. Not systematically structured.

Very high level, and then links to extremely detailed scientific papers. The way the quiz is presented is nonsense, very hard to follow or read.

It was too hard to relate to the content being presented by the presenter. Couple of questions answers is not coming accurately on Gemini.

nice course, but question 2 of the Quiz does not have the 'correct question' as such

Pros: - Instructor in video was energetic. Cons: - Instructor mumbled some key words and spoke too fast. - Instructor never took beats on key components. - Editing switched to extreme 3/4 profile view and then kept shots where the instructor turned their head from camera. For those that need to see lips to understand words (like myself) this makes it challenging to follow along. - Reading material is a single PDF with around 30 links to other published content. Apparently the 30 minutes quoted for expected time is only based on the material you decide to read, rendering the whole reading portion optional.