The second half of the course was more effective than the first half, as was the presenter. In general, watching a lecturer is not useful for online training, instead training materials should be presented while the presenter is perhaps displayed in a small inset. The material was mostly intuitive - some research results were interesting and counter-intuitive. The informal roles section was useful and there was material presented which helped me think about my teams in a new way.

Not nearly as helpful as the previous courses in this program. Neither the lectures or the interviews provided a big insight in to what makes a good leader, but rather spoke of leadership in a theoretical sense, not how it applies in a real life setting.

Too long videos

Not practical

There is very little insight in this course. The instructor's slides are very poorly-done, relying on graphs that aren't appropriate for the data being presented and without labeling the axises. There is no engagement in the course forums. The quizzes are trivial to pass.

The given information was superficially, and I would have wished to learn more. This course is not a complete as the courses before. Especially the conflict solving part is very little of practical information.

Desnecessária a avaliação dos colegas. O curso é até interessante, mas se torna muito burocrático ao condicionar a avaliação final com essa estratégia.

presents little knowledge , looks more like a youtube crashcourse than a course by University of Michigan .. Im so dissapointed

please don't do this course if you are a woman of if you are a POC. you'll find it very offensive. That's why a quit.