Contents are great, but the instructions for graded assignments are highly confusing and not stated properly.

Good top-level examination of Python. Some typos and confusing questions strewn throughout the module.

There were some glaring errors in the testing section but otherwise a decent introduction to Python.

Course needs more coding practices that lead up to program assignments.

The course is good though not easy for newbie in programming

Assignments didn't really match with the course.

ensemble casting gives real life feel.

to much theory, few practice

While this course covered diverse topics, I couldn't simply rely on the course for a deeper understanding. The Python course fell short of meeting expectations. While Week One was passable, the subsequent weeks suffered from numerous typos and code errors. Week three proved to be the most disappointing, characterized by a confusing course structure, poorly designed quizzes, inadequate content, flawed choice of examples, and an abundance of errors. Even free courses available elsewhere offer superior content. Meta should update this course ASAP.

I enjoyed the first course of the program but this course is very hard to follow along. No offense to the british guy, but man, I zone out so bad when he's doing video instruction. They are not clear as to why you should do a certain thing in code, they just say "do this ..." and expect you to retain that for their projects. It really should be, "do this because" and immediately apply the tools. Maybe its just me, but too much reading and video, not enough hands on instruction. If I wanted to read, I would've ordered a book.

i like this course but i am having challenges and they are not responding to me, i don't have money for upgrading the course and i thought that the financial aid covers that. will it affect my certificate if i don't do the upgraded quizzes. is there no other options?

Ridiculously long and nearly all the labs do not cover what is being taught. This course should truly be split into two different courses and a review MUST be made for correct the lab responses and align with information being taught.

poorly explanations, many bugs and errors in assignments, not beginner friendly at all

There are numerous errors in both the lectures and in some of the quizzes

the examples were really hollow and it was very compact in some videos

Too simple. Needed harder assignments

wordy, terrible course!

These videos cover the basics but they don't say what instances you would use the code in. The assignments asks for things that was not gone over in any of the videos (I have gone over the lectures three times). You learn to list all coffees with the letter C out of a list of coffees but in the assignment you are supposed to return a list with employee names and their jobs and there is example code I have never before seen. It is infuriating and all I've learned is that I have wasted a lot of time.

Thanks for putting together the course. Breadth of content was good and helpful. However, the content is not well structured, with overlaps, quizzes before content, insufficient explanation in some areas, non-ideal examples and technical inaccuracies. This should be reviewed, to be more accessible for newcomers to programming

The worst class I have ever taken. No support whatsoever. Nobody monitors questions on the discussion group and that is the only place you can get any help. I see a lot of students having problems and no replies.

Chaotic and full of problems

poor sound quality

vcccfgxtyvj