some concepts are missing

course is very low paced

Pace is a little slow

got the basics right

very slow in teching

it is too slow

it was good

Great!!!!!

no comends

too basic

very slow

too basic

amazing

thanks

great

great

good

Good

good

nice

good

Read if you're going to take this course. While you will get excellent information from it, there are some major areas that the course is lacking that can make your learning progress slower and more difficult. Some of this includes errors in the programs used for examples in the course. But the main issue I found was that it is INCREDIBLY disorganized. In terms of teaching logic, it's mostly lacking that. On multiple occasions, you get administered exercises on content that hasn't been taught yet (only to find it in the next lesson) or you'll find that information isn't completely explained just to find the info you've been wanting shows up at the end of the course instead. Which makes zero sense. It would have been much better for complete explanations to occur while exercises were being assigned. There was even a video in week 4 where the prof. talked about us having "not done" what he was talking about yet when we had absolutely already done it in previous weeks. So, for whatever reason, this was clearly taught out of order (as is also evident in how the book exercises are assigned). It made a whole lot more difficult than it had to be. The course also could do a much better job than it does in explaining why the code works the way that it does. They tend to rely a lot on Code Lens to do this (you'll see what this is as you dive in) rather than give a really good explanation. Which, if you're already somewhat familiar with Python, this may not be a big deal. But it can be a big deal for beginners. And since the course is advertised as appropriate for beginners, it would be great if those explanations where handled more thoroughly. If you dive in, my biggest recommendation would be to watch all the videos in a week FIRST before completing any assignments and take great notes while doing it. Then, go back and complete the assignments and quizzes in order from there after. You'll be missing information you need to really understand the exercises otherwise. I would love to rate this higher. The information is good. But it was too much of a fight to find and learn to apply the information shared because of the number of course mistakes and extreme disorganization of the material.

- the lecturing videos are bit old - lecture and exercise number do not match - 90% of the assignments don't have explanation which led to google for answers - didn't like how they divided the workload - the week 4 workload is a lot, consisted of 5 graded assignments for the last week to complete

Pretty unhappy with what was contained when I left.. looked like an older program and some of the staff was .. how shall I say it? not looking like they cared about too muck in the way of dress? I will look for another course in Python 3.

Quality of video is blurry. Topics are good but not explained well. Real monotone

instructors and really don't make it any fun to learn. Basic teraching.