The second part of the course needs a lot more explanation.

good courses

The first two modules were great and at the same pace as the ones before. However, the last two were extremely rushed. The instructor failed to accurately walk through everything that would eventually be tested on. With these sections heavily focusing on statistics, it would be helpful to know how certain numbers/solutions came to be. It would be helpful to give more example of how the formulas are used with all pieces plugged in rather than just showing us a complex formula and then testing us on it. Lastly, someone should go in and spell/grammar check the slides.

The accent is rough. He knows his stuff about QUANT, but clarity goes a long way when it comes to stats. I would also recommend showing more about the actual process behind the concepts thru excel. It's one thing to explain it; it's another to show the steps to apply it. Also, many supplementary materials and links were broken and outdated.

Unfortunately the statics part of the course is just terrible, impossible to follow. Exercises are not clear with question about the topics not even mentioned in the lecture. I used You tube all the time to be able to understand anything.

Instructors are not that good at explaining concepts

The course rarely touches on the quantitative analysis part of the course

very bad espcailly for the statical stuff , just theory without any digging in the information

the second instructor's English pronunciation is not very good. He mixes some words sound like something else or it's unclear what he said so repeatedly need to follow the subtitles for his speech to get the things.

Its fairly easy till the end when they want a complete statistical analysis done in excel. They should say in the description you need a solid statistical understanding to complete this course.

creo dejan oracticas muy complicadas, para analizar, ejemplos muy avanzados, y las tareas son muy pesadas de resolver

my course is not getting reviwed for peer grade assigment