The course offers a lot of insights for a beginner, but the way it is taught is a little outdated. I'd recommended improving the production of the vdo or adding more visual aids

A well thought course on the composition of items. The main strength is that it is supported both by the expertise of the speakers and academic literature.

Interesting course, but sometimes more explanations would have been helpful. Videos could be a bit more appealing.

A recommended course for researchers, aspiring PhD candidates and anyone who is interested in curvey based research

It would be very useful for teachers, teacher-trainers etc. They must go for this course.

Very practical and with many references course. Lectures can be less boring

It is a good course after some basic knowledge of questionnaire

Great class for helping one lay out a proper review

Helpful material and instructors are knowledgeable.

Great course understand research method and design!

A good overview of questionnaire design elements.

Good course. Useful for research students.

Could be more practical.

Really valuable insight

Very useful examples

Very useful.

good

I found it hard to hold my interest since the instructors' voices were so mono-toned. I found myself having to replay many videos as my attention span wasn't there. Otherwise, the class was very informative. Although I do not develop surveys for a large number of respondents, I can still apply many of the

It was very time consuming, however very interesting. Maybe less hours of video if so many readings are requested. Try to balance video time and reading time.

There should be more than just lectures. I find the overall content to be very exciting but at times the lectures get a little boring and monotonous maybe.

Is is a good course, though ironically some of the questions in the quizzes are a bit long and confusing...

Not quite what I expected. More on the role of the interviewer than the actual design of questionnaires.

The content is useful but it's really dry and hard to focus on.

The material is useful, but the execution is poor. There were numerous quiz questions that I think they just had coded wrong on their end. I think they need to carefully look at the questions with the most incorrect answers and ask themselves if they've made a mistake. Also, this might be the first time they've tried making a peer-reviewed project part of the course, but they did a poor job. They made it a homework assignment for week 2, but didn't make it clear that it wasn't due until the end of the course, even though Coursera sends you emails saying it's due soon. This caused a great deal of confusion. Some of the required readings also had broken links. It's odd nobody on their end checked those the week the material was taught. They do provide a lot of useful supplemental material (though often pay-walled).

Readings were not necessary for the course and quizzes were extremely difficult, seeming to be worded in an attempt to stump students, and many questions were not from the course lessons. Videos very dry and boring.