El Curso me resultó más que enriquecedor, ampliando conocimientos y fundamentos esenciales aplicables a diferentes campos no sólo el científico

A lot of interesting things for a (scientifically) illitterate as I am.

Relatively easy to follow, despite of my italian mother tongue. :-)

What an insightful and informative course. Broadened the knowledge about timely topics and how to look at problems in a scientific eye.

very useful for critically analyzing news articles, credentials and understanding personal biases. Great course!

It is a course, where everything is explained very simply and you learn things that will be useful for life

Feeling more comfortable around other people when we our discussion is about scientific studies.

Great mix of reading, video and practice tools. It was a challenging and entertaining course.

Learning the ability to think critically is tough. This course is a great way to start.

Curso fundamental para pesquisadores aprenderem sobre o raciocínio científico!

Helped a lot in trying to think critically in this new age of misinformation.

The best course that I have taken. Thank you! WIll always think critically.

Thank you very much. This course is so timely. I highly recommend this.

Well put together with great examples and loved the videos!

This is a new and interesting course related to science.

An eye opener course. Except for drag and drop

It was truly transformational! thank you

excellent instruction and presentations

The best course. What an insight!

didático, digerível e rico.

Thanks very much!

very interesting

excellent

Great

Good!

1) It's a bit of a weird mix of assuming you know science reasonably well and assuming you know nothing... I'm not sure if that's an issue with the course itself or an issue with how/if corsera maybe tries to level the type of learning it feeds you. 2) They have a thing where they ask you to match comments under headings - I found this really hard - also there is no way to go back an reorganize the info, if you want to figure out the right answer you have to re-do the whole thing. For some types of information this made sense (like ID and categorize the problem statements and the solution statements). But for others this made absolutely zero sense (like ID which statement is from a conclusion or a methods section..... note: the article we read did not have well defined conclusion and methods sections and the different statements didn't actually match to where they were in the article, nor the type of statement you would write if you were writing a conclusion or method or discussion or abstract.... I'm still not sure how they put things where, and ended up doing that part by scientific elimination logic. Test the hypothesis it goes in place A, if not place A try place B, keep notes so you can rearrange multiple spots at once. They need to fix that - because it was frustrating and no learning happened. Severe mismatch between type of testing and info type provided there. In other places the matching was kind of fun - because the logic of what you are placing where made sense. Like the name the fallacy statements... it made the fallacy section fun.3) There were a number of broken links where I had to go looking on Youtube for the video - I think I found the correct ones... but dudes - it's a university level course, they need to fix those. Plus one video that was completely missing any links at all. I'm going to chalk that up to a platform failure not a course failure.... but the people who made the course need to get that fixed.Finally - did I learn stuff - yes I did. It was also a great review of things I already knew. I wish there had been more concrete instruction around the communicating science module - it was very surface level stuff - which was a disappointment, but otherwise it was tons of fun. I'm giving this an 8/10, with an acknowledgement that it might be really frustrating for a non-science or non-academic to take... especially given the missing links and stuff.