Learner Reviews & Feedback for Six Sigma Advanced Analyze Phase by Kennesaw State University
About the Course
Top reviews
M
Jul 19, 2019
The overview of the DOE is very useful to understand the basic concepts of the DOE. My suggestion would be including the DOE project in exercise for further understanding of the modules.
KM
Dec 12, 2020
Great course to learn about six sigma Green belt from entrance level to expertise level. I highly recommend this course. Thank you all for the immense support throughout the course.
126 - 150 of 153 Reviews for Six Sigma Advanced Analyze Phase
By Sagar G
•Aug 22, 2021
great course with clarity in learning introduction to six sigma specialization
By Laura V M
•Nov 22, 2020
It needs to be of a higher complexity if it is a "green belt" and "advanced"
By Lauren R
•Aug 19, 2022
the math, could have been broken down a bit more in the videos
By Ashwini S
•May 2, 2022
Overall very good course. Can have more examples to simplify .
By EBRAHEM A
•Oct 9, 2020
Good course to know more about analysis to take a decision
By BRIKEN F
•May 25, 2019
Lack of practical example to apply in industry
By MAURICIO J Z S
•Mar 4, 2021
excelente curso, aprendi mucho
By John B
•Mar 10, 2018
The book is terrible.
By Binod K
•Sep 11, 2020
Good course material
By Yasser C
•Sep 19, 2020
Nice simple course
By Camilo J M G
•Jan 19, 2021
excelente curso
By Michael A E
•Jul 6, 2020
Great details
By juan c z
•Feb 1, 2022
Exelent!!
By Guisseppe K M P
•Sep 7, 2020
impressive
By Umar I
•Feb 21, 2023
Gratitude
By SABEEL A A K
•Nov 4, 2020
good
By Tiago G d S
•Jul 15, 2020
Good
By Sriram P
•May 9, 2020
good
By Hesham M O
•Jul 16, 2021
The efforts put in by the lecturers and their knowledge and guidance are admired and respected, however I feel like the entire specialization (all 5 courses) could use ALOT of improvement. I only mention them to help improve and benefit the Lecturers and the Coursera community. First the entire specialization could use a lot more visual aid. There are free lectures on Youtube that are much more friendly and animated than the video lectures presented here. I recommend getting rid of the presentation-style of teaching and adopting more modern/animated approaches. (Statistics in general is a field that needs a lot of visual aid)
Moreover, the quizzes (although I understand as someone who takes the quiz I might be biased) should be revised for clarity. This is my personal feeling as some questions feel subjective, and the answers might differ according to different prespectives, some other questions feel a bit irrelevant to the interests of the learner. I don't know if this mimics the green belt certificate exam, but I think this shouldn't be the case for a scientific topic. At least thats the feeling I had answering some of the questions.
Last but not least, please don't make students buy the book, if they already paid for the course. Write your own content.
By DARSHAN M
•Apr 15, 2020
the course content is good but it is too less specially in DOE section. in DOE there is more than 2 factorial used in real word but it not cover.
By robin s
•Jul 12, 2019
Ok theory does not necessarily cover how you can use it in the real world. or the process of using a DOE
By Eduardo G
•Nov 6, 2018
It is hard to follow all the possible tests. Maybe that area should be treated at a slower pace.
By Carlos E
•May 15, 2018
Slides clearly need improvement. Explanations should not be just a reading of slides.
By Marvin O S
•Mar 15, 2019
Difficulty level of video material is very different over this module
By KAPIAMBA K F
•Apr 17, 2020
Very limited content both in quantity ang depht