The review on how to use Figma was too brief. I am still struggling with creating a wireframe after the course

The rating of the final project through others is a joke. People give random ratings.

not what i was expecting, just meeh

I'm a coder, not as designer.

Very old school

The purpose of the course (supposedly) is to teach something very visual, so relying on videos that just show someone talking for most of the video parts is not at all helpful. It's like they put the minimum effort in to get some money out of people.

I did not like the Figma instructions. I found them not very useful and unnecessarily long. I checked a couple of youtube videos and learned the whole thing in approx 2hrs.

Outdated lessons for Figma intro, poor quiz structure and content (Some question were incorrect).

You can learn how to use Figma, but it will not teach you to make designs

Peer grading from non professions in a UX field is dangerous. The assessment grade lowered my course grade. For instance, out of 2 graders one identified I had the personas photo on my journey map. If one saw it how did the other not? Also, on the low fidelity wireframe the graders agreed that there was a place to select times for dining, but in the high fidelity prototype only one said it was present. In UX the low fidelity wireframe is what tells your high fidelity what needs to be designed. It's the blueprint. So there was no way that should have been graded that way. Also, one out of two said there was no place to put the customers information, when in the low fidelity wireframe they both agreed there was. This is a nuisance to professionals who actually take this serious and deserve fair grading. They should be graded by other professionals. Thanks.

Great subject, terrible course. Full of errors, inconsistencies and missing course materials. Most of the content is far too brief, it feels like they can't be bothered to teach this leaving you to have to go away and learn it all yourself elsewhere, but not from the additional reading links that they suggest as most are behind paywalls (are the course teachers on affiliate commissions?). Errors in the final quiz that conflict with the explanations they direct you to from within the course when answers are "wrong". Final project is a joke - mostly scammers submitting fake documents and marking each other 100%, devaluing any certificates this course provides, and the suggested final solution is so poor quality, it's like it's been done by someone that hasn't even taken the course yet, let alone someone supposedly teaching it.

Boring, monotonous instructors. Vague and unclear instructions for assigments. Of all the courses I've done on Coursera, this one was the most painful. Sorry to say, the instructor in the pink shirt looks like an AI and talks like a robot. The peer-graded assessment is expected to be a set of Figma files, but some people just upload screenshots or word documents and there is no check on file type? Assigment instructions are broken into multiple units and it's confusing. Too much focus on theoretical concepts and definitions as well...I don't know, maybe I just didn't enjoy the course material but it's a 1 star for me. Other courses in this certificate path so far are fine though.

For front-end developers, knowing UX/UI design basics and using Figma is crucial. But this course doesn't really teach those basics. In my opinion, front-end developers benefit more from using DEV mode rather than delving into the intricate features of Figma designed specifically for designers. The course has too much extra info and doesn't cover the essential UX/UI concepts or give useful tips for developers.

The course could be great if the course parts were connected to each other. Don't buy the course, please.

No practical explanation and a lot of theory.

Não recebi meu certificado

很差劲