Chevron Left
Back to Start the UX Design Process: Empathize, Define, and Ideate

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Start the UX Design Process: Empathize, Define, and Ideate by Google

4.8
stars
15,582 ratings

About the Course

Start the UX Design Process: Empathize, Define, Ideate is the second course in a certificate program that will equip you with the skills needed to apply to entry-level jobs in user experience (UX) design. In this course, you’ll complete the first phases of the design process for a project that you’ll be able to include in your portfolio. You will learn how to empathize with users and understand their pain points, define user needs using problem statements, and come up with lots of ideas for solutions to those user problems. Current UX designers and researchers at Google will serve as your instructors, and you will complete hands-on activities that simulate real-world UX design scenarios. Learners who complete the seven courses in this certificate program should be equipped to apply for entry-level jobs as UX designers. No previous experience is necessary. By the end of this course, you will be able to: - Empathize with users to understand their needs and pain points. - Create empathy maps, personas, user stories, and user journey maps to understand user needs. - Develop problem statements to define user needs. - Generate ideas for possible solutions to user problems. - Conduct competitive audits. - Start designing a mobile app, a new project to include in your professional UX portfolio....

Top reviews

TB

Sep 29, 2021

This course is very good & massively designed for student's who are biginner in UX field. The lecturers are also self proffessional experienced UX designer. Is not is great for carrier!!! Pretty cool!

MG

Sep 9, 2022

I love this course! Personally, it took me longer than I thought to complete each challenge, but I loved each step, especially the ideation and research part! I already want to start the next course!

Filter by:

2751 - 2775 of 2,831 Reviews for Start the UX Design Process: Empathize, Define, and Ideate

By Neeti S

•

May 27, 2023

The cource is intersting and deep in knowlege

By Sifleen k

•

Mar 10, 2023

the last project took quite a lot of time!

By Nifemi D A

•

Jun 3, 2024

Needs more practice and less theories.

By Hank W

•

Aug 21, 2022

The competitive audit was a headache

By fabian E

•

Jun 7, 2022

Great course, you can learn so much

By Aamir A J

•

Feb 27, 2023

It Was quite lengthy course

By Bashiru A A

•

Oct 20, 2023

Well designed course.

By Diego F

•

Dec 27, 2021

its was kinda bland

By Sofia N

•

Oct 25, 2022

too basic for me

By Neeraja S

•

Jan 8, 2023

good experience.

By degreeuserdf t

•

Nov 16, 2021

rate this course

By Noman J

•

Oct 1, 2023

Decent course

By Bhaviniben C

•

Apr 3, 2023

very helpfull

By Marjorie B

•

Aug 17, 2022

It was good!

By Sajjad H

•

Oct 1, 2022

not easy

By Francesco M

•

Jan 12, 2022

too long

By Siavash R

•

Mar 2, 2022

OKAY

By Victoria H

•

Jun 6, 2023

good

By Vishwas s

•

May 5, 2022

Good

By Irina M

•

Jul 13, 2022

0

By Dan L

•

May 6, 2022

By Jonathan S J P

•

Jul 28, 2023

Although the course is well organized and has lots of valuable information, there are very few examples given for the assignments and projects found within the course. As this was supposedly designed for people who have no previous background in UX Design, it would have been much more helpful if we the students were informed on more specifics such as how to evaluate different aspects of the competitive audit instead of gleaning information off of the two or three premade competitive audit examples. Although finding our own examples for one of our projects is a useful way to gain real world experience in doing a competitive audit, the CoffeeHouse project would have been much more of a useful stepping stone if there were premade example situations and competitor websites/apps for us to work through and gain a feel of how it is to do an audit. Many times for many of the categories I was not sure what exactly to write under my evaluation of Outstanding/Good/Needs Work etc; because of my unfamiliarity with doing an audit. Also since our design challenges are randomly created at the beginning of the course, the few examples given do not always line up in terms of simplicity or symmetry with what we are attempting to design for our own projects. More examples and actual practice exercises with set situations, competitors, and outcomes would be very useful.

By Didi A

•

Oct 24, 2023

I liked the course, but they recently took out peer-graded assessments which was a huge mistake from Google. The assessments gave you feedback from other people on the course and kept you accountable because you had to submit to get your certificate and move to the next section. It is now a multiple-choice answer, While this will make you speed through the course, there is no way for the course to verify that I am doing the work. Makes is very lazy. I feel they should have implemented the changes for newcomers on the course, not the people who have already started. It makes me question the worth and weight of the certification now. Very disappointing indeed. Huge mistake from Google.

By Kate A

•

May 17, 2023

The course itself is very good. But there're people who clearly downgrade your assignments on purpose. I didn't think that the situation with peer-reviews is so bad, I submitted my assignment 3 times but there's always 1 person putting extremely low grades which make no sense without any explanation, just with a comment like "..", "I". Contacting support didn't give anything. I already started to think that they are bots or some company of people giving only bad grades because it looks too suspicious.

By Elizabeth B

•

Nov 29, 2022

I thought that the content was good but the competitive audit assignment had some problems. I spent more time trying to FIND 'real' competitors for my fake company than I did assessing their content. I think it would have been vastly more useful to do this assignment for the coffee house example or something similar, where we could be given the competitors to assess, particularly given that this isn't part of the overall portfolio.