TM
Invalid date
The material itself is worth a few stars. Clearly lots of work has gone into making some interesting interactive matlab demos. some of the quizzes are unnecessarily confusing.
AA
Invalid date
I think it is the hardest course among all other courses in this specialization, but it was completely convenient .
By Alvaro C
•Apr 10, 2017
Aunque el curso es interesante es necesario investigar mucho en internet para poder realizar parte de las tareas. En toda esta serie de cursos no se pide requisito alguno, pero es necesario saber utilizar matlab para poder realizar las tareas, que dicho sea de paso, no dejan aprendizaje alguno. Un mejor nombre para todos estos cursos sería "aprende a utilizar matlab como puedas". En los videos explican algunas cosas y luego se pide completar una función que realiza una tarea mínima. En ocasiones tengo que leer varias veces la asignación de tarea, leer con cuidado el código existente, y ver dos o tres videos para entender lo que debo hacer. Tengo doctorado en física y soy profesor universitario, y si para mi es complicado entender qué debo hacer, no quiero imaginar lo que sería para un estudiante que cumple con los requisitos para tomar este curso, es decir "no experiencia previa". De un tiempo para acá se debe utilizar matlab en linea, que es de lo peor que puede existir: es lento y casi inutilizable. Con esto, entonces no se cumple con el trato original. Es una pena que se deba pagar por anticipado por estos cursos fraudulentos.
By A R
•May 31, 2023
unfortunately, this is one of the most disappointing online courses I've ever had! It had so much potential. I thought i'm going to learn a lot from the lectures but what really happened was that i was bombarded with lots of unknown knowledge and subjects without enough explanation and introduction! i couldn't even understand lots of scientific terms, not to say follow the topics! and i have studied electrical and chemical engineering! this made me have to search a lot on the internet which was what i intended (and that's actually why i took this course so i won't have to search clueless on the internet and read tons of books!)
By Julian B
•Sep 8, 2016
This course, was really bad structured, was often the discrepancy between the information provided in the videos and the questions in the Quiz. Also a lot of time the system was very picky to take an answer like correct, just because the format used, for example e!=E in one equation, and because this was necessary a lot of guessing in order to find how the system take the answer by correct.
But really the worst was the discrepancy between the video and the quiz, because my impression is that the videos were cut to fix in the time, but they were cut a lot, missing important information to be used in the quiz.
By Deleted A
•Mar 17, 2022
This course is extremely poor, certainly the absolutely poorest of the three I have taken in this robotics sequence. Quizzes have little to do with videos and the videos spend more time with esoteric crap than with useful explanations of critical topics. The discussion sessions are the only helpful parts of this course. Th engineer seeking to probe the field of robotics would be better served through a good textbook as well as periodic perusal of pertinent research literature than taking this course.
By Timothy O
•Dec 8, 2016
The lectures are a very brief overview of topics, with nothing actually taught. The quizzes are entirely disconnected from the lectures and require basically just finding and reading the right wikipedia pages. This course is an absolute joke and an embarrassment to UPenn, Coursera, and everyone involved. It's clear that the instructors don't care about student's actually learning anything. Compare this to the "Underactuated Robotics" course on EdX.
By balaji R
•Jan 7, 2021
This course needs to be Restructured a Lot.. There is no Practise materials for the students to understand. Only lots of information from Research papers are being presented. And for the quizzes we had to pass via Guessing..
******** No learning *****
WHAT A ABSOLUTE WASTE OF TIME.. :(
VERY SORRY :( TOTALLY DISAPPOINTED.. :(
By Erick A M D
•Nov 26, 2020
The lectures should have been very interesting, but they were taught very lightly. Questionnaires are very confusing, and you need to have perfect score in order to advance, then you need to make them several times. Profesor Avik De could have a lot better explanations. I really expected a lot more of the course.
By Mohammad H
•Jun 28, 2019
Although my background is engineering, but the course discusses very complex equation with minimal details. I suggest maybe you can split this course into two courses one of them is advanced, so that student get chance to understand these topics properly.
By Wilmer A R
•Mar 21, 2016
The quiz do not relate to the lectures....a lot of thinks need to be explore in documents outside of the course and the knowledge of the student has to be higher. Not a course for not engineering background.
By Nicola g
•Mar 27, 2016
It is not well done as the previous courses. The quizzes usually do not concern the topic of the lessons or better, the lessons do not help in anyway to solve the problems.
By Deleted A
•Oct 16, 2016
This course is the worst one in this specialization. The notations are ambiguous and the quizzes are poorly designed.
By 林子策
•Jun 27, 2024
the content is too hard for elementary level and loosing its engineering utility and update to the current trend.
By SHUBHAM K W
•Aug 12, 2019
Very Difficult course with minimal explanations. Please elaborate on content before asking questions in quizzes.
By J. D
•Jun 2, 2016
Poorly designed course which tests people on things that are not taught.
By Aditya S
•Oct 20, 2020
Too many quizzes to give and too questions aren't always clear.
By Mehrad G
•Apr 21, 2023
Worst ever course, a complete waste of time.