Videos present information very fast with spoken text mostly just reading out slide content in minimally longer sentences. This leaves no time to benefit from the combination of audio and video. In order to remember any details videos need to be re-viewed or be stopped frequently. The tools used during the course always come as a surprise and multiple accounts for different tools would have to be created over time. It is not understandable why the same environment used for the final exercise cannot also be used for the different hands-on exercises.

Buen curso, pero malas traducciones al español. Recomendable seguirlo en inglés. Es contradictorio en un curso que explica las ventajas de la IA -especialmente en el tratamiento de textos gracias a los LLM (Grandes modelos lingüisticos)- haya generado tan malas transcripciones de los videos y sobre todo de las pruebas / Test al español... Resultan confusos y erróneos y denotan la falta de supervisión de un especialista -humano- (en mi opinión, el verdadero peligro de la IA... Más allá del sesgo, o la ética...).

I know this is about AI and makes sense to use it to create the course – but I wish there was a person actually on the videos for better teaching. Seeing only ai generated slides matching the sound with ai content curated by somebody is lacking the stickiness needed on learning materials imo. I guess as an intro is OK, but the format could have been given some more dedication.

It's too repetitive from time to time, I'm doing the IBM Generative AI Engineering Professional Certificate and this course with the introduction to artificial intelligence usually covers the same topics but deeper, it's too slow and repetitive for me.

The quality of the course is meh... nothing you can't learn from Youtube. The quality of the questions asked at the end of each module is absolutely terrible and extremely poorly designed.

The quizzes seemed misaligned with the coursework. I would have preferred more talk on specific programs throughout the course if that is what we are being graded on.

I know it’s beginner level but it’s extremely basic. stars given for having some structure and not dragging out the content which means it’s quick to go through.

Fast course, just intro to AI models. If you know absolutely nothing, might be useful somehow. Otherwise looks like the hole course was generated by AI.

The topics covered is good. Hands on is also good. However, the narration is way too fast. It was difficult to absorb/assimilate the knowledge.

Very generalized (not that there's anything wrong with being general - hence "average").

Wish it could explain a little bit more on how the generative AI works on the back stage

It is good. I think a little more deep insider would be better for senior developers

Very superficial information considering it a section of a course for developers.

I know it's crazy how fast AI moves but a fair amount of the material is dated.

Information is good, video info is to quick, hands-on work is often not working

Good introduction for those that have not started their journey in AI.

The narration was not as good and well-paced as the previous course.

Corso basilare di introduzione all'intelligenza artificiale

Too generic. Too simple. Its a 5/10.

mejores tallerres , mayor practica

bbbb

The videos showed too much information about too many applications in a very compressed video. Had a hard time keeping track of so many similar applications. Examples were cool. Wished it was more mobile-friendly. Hard to do the course on the go. Had to wait to get home to do this were I have too many distractions.

Unimpressed. More IBM marketing than I expected. If you want a something focused on "look at some of the neat things you can do with Generative AI in 2023" then this might be right for you.

كان هنالك الكثير من الكلام لكن المحتوى يجب ان يكون قليل لانه المعلومات الاساسية واضحة و معروفة لكن بدلا من التركيز عليهم كان يدور حولهم . وترجمة الاختبارات النهائية للعربية سييييئة جدا

Pretty basic. It is too basic to be part of Gen AI for "Software developers" specialization