Learner Reviews & Feedback for Sequence Models by DeepLearning.AI
About the Course
Top reviews
AM
Jun 30, 2019
The course is very good and has taught me the all the important concepts required to build a sequence model. The assignments are also very neatly and precisely designed for the real world application.
MK
Mar 13, 2024
Cant express how thankful I am to Andrew Ng, literally thought me from start to finish when my school didnt touch about it, learn a lot and decided to use my knowledge and apply to real world projects
3551 - 3575 of 3,689 Reviews for Sequence Models
By Michael K
•Aug 6, 2018
Assignments are very buggy and instructions misleading or incomplete. However the core material is excellent
By PANKAJ R
•May 8, 2018
Require a little depth, considering the complexibility. At least 4 Week course should be their instead of 3
By Gargi V
•Feb 7, 2020
There were a lot of issues with the notebook especially, for the week 3. The concepts were well explained.
By Mikko L
•Apr 14, 2018
Would have required more of the "intuition" building material. Worst of the 5 course series, but still ok!
By kumom
•Feb 6, 2020
Contents are way too easy and the video recordings are often a bit broken (repetition, blank audio, etc.)
By Alexander B
•Feb 14, 2018
incredibly boring. I mean at some task you literally asked to type in "= False" instead "= None". Really?
By Jinxi W
•Feb 20, 2018
There are some mistakes need to be correct in the assignments. Still a lot of improvements can be made.
By Yao G
•Sep 12, 2018
The assignments should be improved. More prep on Keras will help improve the efficiency of learning.
By Kabakov B
•Aug 30, 2020
The practical tasks is bad. You are simply needed to rewrite formulas to python most of the time.
By Benoit D F
•Mar 19, 2018
Very interesting topic but coding exercices and quizzes were a bit clunky and in need for ironing
By Joao C M
•Sep 29, 2023
Very good content but several Python exercises were far-fetched for the novice Python programmer
By Andrei M
•Jun 18, 2018
The content is super interesting, but the assignments are more of the same 'fill in the blank'.
By Lars O A
•May 29, 2018
Put to much focus into getting the Keras code to work instead of truly learning the algorithms.
By NAGARAJ R
•Jan 23, 2019
I found this very hard to follow along. The concepts were too heavy and needs a slower pace.
By Anmol D
•Mar 21, 2021
Theory explained in a better way, but practicals could have been more involved and better.
By Sidharth S
•Dec 23, 2018
Really Nice course. Could have been more fun if Keras and it's functioning had more focus.
By Uttam R
•Mar 26, 2018
Course is got but grader compilations are horrible spent more time on them than the course
By Iván G
•Mar 13, 2019
Not as good as structured in explanation nor in programming assigments as the last ones.
By mohsin j
•Jun 7, 2018
This is only good enough, not good course. All previous ones were 5 stars, definitely!
By jinwei z
•Feb 1, 2022
the lab and programming is not as intuitive as the first two course in the specilism.
By Thomas P
•Apr 9, 2020
Overall a great class. I had some trouble understanding the programming assignments.
By Manuel M
•Aug 13, 2023
The transformer content was very light and not clear relative to the other content.
By Archana A
•Oct 7, 2019
This felt the the least prepared and organized course of the series, unfortunately.
By Ankit A
•Jul 17, 2022
give projects that we can build from ground up without your inbuilt function.
By Sébastien C
•Aug 18, 2020
Good theoretical overview - project just require you to fill in lines of code