It could have been more systematic.

A not specific course

nice course

some hard

Most of the videos were really low. Also, the persons that were speaking on the videos were speaking like they were talking to themselves intead of teaching. It was frustrating.

The Linux part was rough, needs a little more professionalism. A lot of the content isn't teaching, it's slide reading.

A pesar de tener un buen programa, la calidad de los videos de los cursos de IBM es deprimente.

Instructor Alex Campos portions are very hard to understand both audio and graphics are awful.

The quality of audio and video is still bad. The content is more useful than course 2.

Half of the stuff is not auible at all, which is auible is very distored.

text transcription is machine-generated. Videos not in full resolution

A lot of the information from the previous course are thrown into this one. Literally slide for slide and certain presentations are the exact same ones from the previous course. Waste of money. Unprofessional quality and teaching.

Classes have to be more engaging and better audio quality, by the end i felt like sleeping, this is my honest review and i dont mean any negative crticism but this needs to be improved.

The audio and resolution for the lectures is awful. The information is outdated. Some of the videos are from 2018.

the peer-to-peer assignment taking so longer than expected. which stopping me form moving to the next step.

poor quality voice and explanation.. unable to get certificzteeven aftercompletion on course

Peer reviewing is the worst. Trolls ruin your whole work and experience.

Sorry bu I have send the project by email in word no FEEDBACk,

Poor audio, random training videos stuck together.

Не правильно оценивает тестирование на 5 недели.

worst course ever

not for me

.