A good introduction to CS, but the audio quality could be much better - "inaudible" moments in almost every part of the training materials. In my opinion, it is not an honor for an organization like IBM.

It was a good introduction. However, it could have been made more interesting by giving sample cases or providing simulations of the various concepts introduced.The practical aspect was somewhat missing.

The overall program is well-structured, but the quality of audio, videos and subtitles was poor. I had to search for topics on the web almost every time. However, the course serves as a guide quite well

I am happy to complete this course which is helpful in my career. in this course, I can learn about the cybersecurity key concepts each term basically and clean my doubt regarding some misunderstanding.

In the Introduction to Cybersecurity Tools & Cyber Attacks certificate I received, my ID number is written instead of my surname. I request that my name be changed to BAYRAM GUMUS in the certificate.

Really good information in this course, but the presentation leaves something to be desired: it is often difficulty to understand what people are saying in the videos. Audio quality is not the best.

The Instructor's voice is not clear and sometimes not even audible and the content of the course is not that detailed and practical understanding of the topic has not be given that much attention.

A lot of the presentations had poor audio quality and use of technical language/ abbreviations in a Beginner course. It is good to get a basic idea but some of the presentations were frustrating.

fruitful to tackle cyber security threat and helps to prepare for future attack and also will prepare new rules and manage protection protocol with advance standard against attack and cyber crime

Everything was great only in some videos the audio quality needs to be improved ......the audio input is too bad that even with earphone it's not audible properly...and rest everything is good.

Some of the links were out of date, videos often consisted of broken English, and sometimes hard to read screen. However still a very good worthwhile course if you are willing to work hard.

There is some PPT slides, images, files, are old with poor definition difficult to read and the audio for some slides wasn´t clear for some instructors, repetitive information chapters.

Bon panorama des principaux concepts de la cybersécurité mais la qualité audio de certains intervenants n'est pas toujours de bonne qualité. Les slides sont assez pauvres en illustrations.

The quality of the images provided is poor. (There is a section where the voice is not heard properly.) The text that is insufficient to properly understand the content is unsatisfactory.

Because the course was moderated by many experts, I don't feel like there is a very good continuation of all the materials. You can sometimes notice terms being replicated here and there.

The course is good in general, but some quizzes include questions and information that weren't included in the videos/slides. also some of the quizzes are buggy. I can't see the feedback.

Audio quality is quite bad, there are mistakes in the questions and the closed captioning isn't correct because of the bad audio quality.. did nobody read through this before publishing?

As someone knew to this field, I really would like to have more application than just reading. I am very good at reading and memorizing but then there are few times to apply. thank you

videos are too boring , please make them interest worthy so that its better to learn and people not find boredom . Well whole course is very informative so that I like this course.

Content is interesting and yes, you learn but the audio quality is appalling and in some cases exteremly difficult to understand both because of strong accents and sound quality.

Rich and interesting content, but the overall presentation (voice calls over slide presentations) would have to be reviewed. As well as the grammar in the intended presentations.

Theres a lot of good information but the speakers are often hard to understand and test questions are over stuff that hasnt been covered yet or are extremely confusing questions

Most of the speakers are hard to understand and follow; transcripts have typos, or are sometimes incomplete.

have to really concentrate, and repeat topics, to grasp & understand.

course was concept wise good but teaching schema was very poor learners are not eager to learn and audio quality was poor . so i think you will need to improve teaching schema.

The course is overall quite informative and the basics are taught well but the sound quality is poor. A lot of the parts were inaudible and picture quality was also not clear.