The grading system is flawed. The peer reviews by novices are mandatory instead of optional. Grade and completion is dependant upon novices grading assignments. The forced social interaction is a business move to monetize the social networking within the platform. How can a novice student be allowed to pass or fail a project when they are not qualified to teach it. There is no educational value when graded by unqualified persons with zero experience. This should be eliminated. This is cause for invalidating our achievements with employers due to this lazy grading system. Educators are passing their duties unto the student to avoid the work they are supposed to perform. No oversight in these 'Peer Reviewed" assignments. I will only participate in Peer review assignments if they have Zero impact on our grades. This is not a legitimately approved grading system.

The presentation of the material and the material itself is terribly structured and presented. Tests do not check your understanding of the topic, but how well you have learned the text of the lecture, and sometimes without context, the question does not make any sense or have a clear answer. Didn't get any enjoyment from the course and no practical knowledge accordingly.

I am very disappointed by the quality of the lecture delivery. I had to study books and other lessons to understand it fully. I did more self-study to understand each aspect of the syllabus and merely depended on the modules. The money isn't worth it at all.

a little bit more explanation is required. quiz is being asked from what is being narrated word by word. how can anyone remember all the narration.

Presentation was poor