WK
Mar 13, 2018
I was really happy because I could learn deep learning from Andrew Ng.
The lectures were fantastic and amazing.
I was able to catch really important concepts of sequence models.
Thanks a lot!
AM
Jun 30, 2019
The course is very good and has taught me the all the important concepts required to build a sequence model. The assignments are also very neatly and precisely designed for the real world application.
By Rudolf S
•Jul 15, 2019
Quite a lot of bugs in the first week examples. It took me too much time until I browsed the discussion forums.
By SHALEEN A
•Oct 3, 2020
the videos are programming assignments need some serious updates, too many typos and wrong information present
By Maysa M G d M
•Jun 25, 2018
I think you have to know more keras than is explained in the course. The keras documentation it is not enough.
By Raghav G
•Jul 13, 2020
An average course, it is detailed though some of the ending materials get too difficult for me to comprehend.
By Michael K
•Aug 6, 2018
Assignments are very buggy and instructions misleading or incomplete. However the core material is excellent
By PANKAJ R
•May 8, 2018
Require a little depth, considering the complexibility. At least 4 Week course should be their instead of 3
By Gargi V
•Feb 7, 2020
There were a lot of issues with the notebook especially, for the week 3. The concepts were well explained.
By Mikko L
•Apr 14, 2018
Would have required more of the "intuition" building material. Worst of the 5 course series, but still ok!
By kumom
•Feb 6, 2020
Contents are way too easy and the video recordings are often a bit broken (repetition, blank audio, etc.)
By Alexander B
•Feb 14, 2018
incredibly boring. I mean at some task you literally asked to type in "= False" instead "= None". Really?
By Jinxi W
•Feb 20, 2018
There are some mistakes need to be correct in the assignments. Still a lot of improvements can be made.
By Yao G
•Sep 12, 2018
The assignments should be improved. More prep on Keras will help improve the efficiency of learning.
By Kabakov B
•Aug 30, 2020
The practical tasks is bad. You are simply needed to rewrite formulas to python most of the time.
By Benoit D F
•Mar 19, 2018
Very interesting topic but coding exercices and quizzes were a bit clunky and in need for ironing
By Joao C M
•Sep 29, 2023
Very good content but several Python exercises were far-fetched for the novice Python programmer
By Andrei M
•Jun 18, 2018
The content is super interesting, but the assignments are more of the same 'fill in the blank'.
By Lars O A
•May 29, 2018
Put to much focus into getting the Keras code to work instead of truly learning the algorithms.
By NAGARAJ R
•Jan 23, 2019
I found this very hard to follow along. The concepts were too heavy and needs a slower pace.
By Anmol D
•Mar 21, 2021
Theory explained in a better way, but practicals could have been more involved and better.
By Sidharth S
•Dec 23, 2018
Really Nice course. Could have been more fun if Keras and it's functioning had more focus.
By Uttam R
•Mar 26, 2018
Course is got but grader compilations are horrible spent more time on them than the course
By Iván G
•Mar 13, 2019
Not as good as structured in explanation nor in programming assigments as the last ones.
By mohsin j
•Jun 7, 2018
This is only good enough, not good course. All previous ones were 5 stars, definitely!
By jinwei z
•Feb 1, 2022
the lab and programming is not as intuitive as the first two course in the specilism.
By Thomas P
•Apr 9, 2020
Overall a great class. I had some trouble understanding the programming assignments.