...

N/A

yes

gud

Spr

ver

NA

NA

na

na

no

👍

.

.

.

x

S

i

t

Had good foundational concepts about AI, but I think too many conversational videos with IBM engineers presenting their personal opinions about the future of AI. I found most of them to be overly opiniated with elementary analogies and some even with almost no relevance or value to actual learning about AI. For example "comparing AI > to the > Horse & Buggy" come on really, how about using the "Computer" with modern relevance? Highly recommend replacing one or two of these all-talk videos with some real cool and interesting use case examples showing AI in action. A practical and applied presentation in real world scenarios like technical medicine, industrial production, scientific experiment, etc.

a bit too much marketing, filled with ibm motherhood about productivity, efficiency, and improved customer service. Some technical descriptions failed to properly differentiate between traditional application development and AI application development. Also much of the youve got to have ai misses the point that business use applications and processes to improve performance, these can be implemented manually, traditionally programmed, purchased off the self, or developed with AI. It is the process improvement that matters, alternative implementations need to be evaluated. AI can help with some, not others, but you never choose AI just because it is AI.

My expectations for this cource were higher to be honest. The last asignment for both IBM Cloud and Watson Studio wasn't so clear and informative, but very dry and just "do this and press here...". There was no a signle explanation of how we use these tools and why, and how exactly these work, and which other tools we can use and how. For sure I will continue with the second part, because I'm expecting to learn more. In the other hand the speakers were using clear and simple language and made all the information shared easily understood.

The course material was quite helpful, but following through the assignment was troublesome when there were errors(e.g. selecting the location for Watson servers).

The biggest drawback in this course is in the peer review(not sure if it is Coursera's drawback overall), since one has to 'wait' until someone submits the assignment for me to grade and 'complete the course'.

This should be fixed in the long run, since it really goes against Coursera's policy of 'pay minimum tuition by finishing early'.

Good course but there were numerous errors and issues with content. I reported all except one where there was an audio issue with the videos. In general the sound quality was not the best in the videos. Levels are too low, in general and there was audio that was recorded over other audio during one of the videos. I don't recall which but it was obvious. Other than the technical issues, the content was great, informative, and inspiring.

Most of the course had engaging videos and was quite informative. The ethics segment was interesting and important, however the interviewees seemed monotonous and low energy - like they were reading off a prompt. It made it difficult to focus and be enthusiastic about the subject. There were a few outdated links that I was supposed to click on and led to an error page. I flagged them all, please fix!