Videos get a bit boring. I would prefer less videos and more reading about the methodology. I google IBM Data Science Methodology and got more useful information. Why pay for a course that can be Googled?

Case study should have been on simpler example / general topic which everybody would understand or correlate easily. Medical field terminologies / relations would be a black box for most of them

i believe the content is targeting more experienced audience, along the course it was bit hard to keep track of all information and the final assessment also aimed for higher level of knowledge

Complicate course with poor valuation system. It contains a lot of basic information but without detail clarifications. I read external resources for a complex understanding of the material.

The peer review system is just awful. It takes ages to get graded/be able to grade others and the peers might not demonstrate language level required for grading an essay-type assignment.

"Ungraded external tools" are not avaliable. For me, the applied example using medicine was hard to follow. Perhaps something less complicated could help explain better the problem.

Too theoretical and the medical example was such a bad, hard to follow one for the course!

It could be content for one week instead of making it to a full-length 3-week session.

Well, I would say this course has been disappointing so far. I hope it gets better soon. Otherwise, this will be the worst online course I have ever taken in my entire life,

It is a bit too basic and vague. The methodology they propose and the supportive material is useful and interesting bur there are many gaps on the hands-on training.

The course is quite theoretical, I would appreciate more reading material. I don't think that the best way to explain the concepts are by using video lessons.

The quizzes focus too much on the nitty gritty details of the case study, so it is easy to get lost in that and forget the big picture of the methodology.

The videos were very monotonous and frankly quite boring. The content was clearly delivered, but the assignments did not reinforce what was being taught.

The course is interesting but I don't like robotic teaching. I think is missing some human interaction like other coursera courses I've done where you

poorly explained. Exam answers when answered, sometimes it gives you true answer and sometimes wrong answer even though i gave the right answer.

The course materials need updating. The IBM platform has changed which has made it hard to maneuver the website and follow the directions given.

This needs to be revised. Its very confusing, you need more assignments between lessons so that we can show we understand what we have learned

This course can have an easy example to explain the methodology for Data Science but there are hard ones and I really don't like it that much.

The case study was too difficult to understand. I wish a more easier case study was picked to elaborate the datascience methodologies on it

Maybe of interest to people who have no clue about any sort of methodology or problem solving. Too boring and repetitive for everyone else.

Not good for beginners, the CHF example was complex and I think this course should be updated with better examples and explanations.

I feel this course is not up to mark. More reading materials should be provided. It will help learner to understand the concept.

Terrible. Very basic. The tool tasks didn't work- timed out. Has no one to grade when it was over. I hope these get better.

I felt that the course was ill prepared. Also I did not like the explanation using the food example. It was not clear

I would have liked for the course to go more in depth of the statistical tools. It was confusing and hard to get.

The case study should have been a general case bit specific to health its difficult to get around the course.