I felt that spreadsheets was wrapped up very quick

Nothing to learn from this course, tricky quizs

was not interested in almost all subject matter

Too much wasting time on basically knowledge.

It's common sense. Not really learning much.

These courses are boring and repetitive!

Somewhat helpful, but aimed at beginners.

I felt this course was rather off topic.

less quantitative than the first course.

no me gusto mucho el contenido, flojito

just a bunch of elementary non sense

Her should be more professional

Instructor was so distracting.

Not detailed enough

Long and drawn out.

very basic

Repetitive

basic

dope

good

good

yes

9i

?

great course setup. I identified with the premise of non bias observation. I personally had pronoun identifiers causing confusion. I did 3 years of english under Mrs. Atnip. West Mecklenburg High School. 1987 Era. quantifiable data. The inclusiveness descripitors are confusing to Me. I surmise The carriculum may ostracise indivudualism. Most of the descriptive identifying pronouns for the student have been removed? very confusing to try to retrain that mental linkage. Your course wants individualism under the guise of an umbrella of inclusiveness.Those are opposing views. I can peform the mental acuity definners. I am concerned that I will be wasting my my efforts, because I may choose to self indentify as ME. I would like a response. I, ME, Myself And I, would like to be able to differentiate the descriptors required, as required for course completion, Rayhack926@gmail.com. I think this is a setup for failure. I will move forward, until I recieve an answer to confirm or deny my suspicions. For now .25 stars. not 1 or 5. If you want real data, you have to be willing to accept more than 1or 5, and I can only give you 5 answers, which will skew the data in your favor. all less than 1 is = to !1? not fair data collection....bias already included