hye

нуқ

yes

dd

.

G

My rating is more like 3.5 stars, and my concerns are (also) around the peer review portion of this course. I personally "reviewed" several submissions that were clearly plagarized, and in one instance they were given to me back-to-back. Since these same people are responsible for reviewing my work, I am left not entirely sure if I am understanding the course material or just the recipient of a passing grade from someone who is trying to cut as many corners as possible to get to their certificate.

As a whole, I walked away from the course feeling relatively confident that I understood the material presented but if someone asked me whether or not they should take this course, it would come with several caveats.

I thought that the peer review required to pass certain sections was horrible!!! To ask other novices to grade my work and suffer their opinions (especially when they didn't read directions) and have MY grade affected by other people who are not experts is ridiculous!!! I have complained about this several times, no one seems to care, or write back - maybe now someone will...? I am a seasoned educator and find this part of the course to be academically unsound and VERY frustrating!!

Basic level course to learn about project management and getting an overview and taste of all the elements involved during all phases of the project. I also learned about different project management tools and techniques which can be applied for effective execution of the project. It should be more through and indepth. level of difficulty for assignments and quizzes should be increased to make this course worthwile and equivalent to PMP certification.

I think everything up to this point was amazing! However, the challenge of waiting on others to offer feedback made things a challenge. I didn't want to really move on until I knew my paper had been sufficient.

It is amazing and has a lot of new knowledge, however, its presentation is too long which leads to boring sometimes.

I suggest it could be presented in a more attractive way not only narrative way

There are too many courses that require mutual evaluation, and it is very unfriendly that they cannot be written in Chinese.

After completing the courses before, this is just extremely repetitive. Instructor is perfect though.

Good course, but not sure how the certificate is going to actually help me get a job in the field.

I would have preferred more readings verse the number of videos there are in this course.

Course contents closed

This delay will not help me

GOOD one ..offer more course for us

All the courses are basically 'OK'

peer reviews are not so great

Videos could be shorter

HARD FIRST QUESTION

hate review thing

will

1. Material concentration and content is acceptable at this course. 2. Сources 1-5 - mostly water . You have to squeeze it very well to identify a piece of meaningful information. Very diluted, like women soap romance book. 3. No quality control. No real teachers are available in this course - considering it as a shame! I never heard that students are forced to grade each other in any reputable educational institution! That annihilate any educational purpose. Where has this been seen in any reputable educational institution? You can only imagine the content of those tests! There are mostly "Help me through" with no tests at all. Some people simply copy the given material and present it for "peer grading", hope that other people will give them "pass". And they will succeed. Shame, nowhere only here, in Coursera you can observe this pattern. 4. Certificate. Guess what, you have to jeopardize and put your identity in danger by providing your complete identity info to some Persona and let this Persona to use all your personal info for 3 years at their full discretion! It's maybe sold, stolen hacked etc. All those risks for what? For getting some certificate from organization with a dubious reputation where is no teachers and students are generously grading each other? Coursera should be upfront about that condition and about all those non-functioning trimmed educational system. Conclusion: Coursera and all companies presented here by Coursera don't really care about education quality and quality personnel, so the purpose is simply clipping monthly money. Sad. It's very sad only.

There was some interesting and relevant material in this course, but I struggled with the presenter. The guest presenters in the main part were great and far more interesting than the main presenter. I am sure he is a lovely guy but he was hard to follow as he used a lot of unnecessary words and was rather wooden, especially after excellent presenters in the previous 2 courses. Most of the videos were way too long. It was really wordy. The example project was diabolical, unethical and felt like cruel profiteering by corporate elitists at the expense of working class people. The AI bit at the end was not at all what interest me as I have no desire to upload sensitive corporate information to the AI machine to save some time. Ironic as this course taught me how to do the work, but then - hey I don't need to bother if I just upload all out info and click some buttons the algorithms will do my job for me. That whole section seemed aimed at getting our corporate data in the guise of getting us to buy additional software also. Boo. Shame to be a downer of an end to what was rally a good course.