Was a little challenging, but I pull through

Good content for a short duration course.

It was simpler than I expected.

I expect to be much detailed

Too fast, lack of examples

hard to understand for me

Isn't beginner-friendly.

need more examples

found useful

good

Good

Good

t

First noticeable thing is that the instructor doesn't convey competence very well. He lacks the practical examples to explain the principles more efficiently. The result for me was that, although he chose not to go deep, the principles weren't as clear, memorable or relevant as I think they could have been.

I did learn a few useful things of course, but it was a disappointment in general.

Please include exercises for computing the ratios and the valuation methods. In-video questions would have helped more. The quiz does not actually test the understanding of the topic in-depth. There can be some external readings suggested - resources that help us get more understanding on the subjects discussed.

ROE = Net Income ($1,280) / Shareholder's Equity ($3,062) = 42%, not 43%. Your mistake in the assignment causes me to be given 0 points.

Very general content. Not as useful as I thought it would be, but maybe I should have read the introduction better:)

Pretty hard to Keep track but the content was good.

I probably need to be a bit more focussed next time.

IT´S A VERY BASIC COURSE. IT´S MISSING ALL ABOUT INTEREST RATES, AND THAT´S WHAT I´M LOOKING FOR.

This course is pretty hand-wavy with very less details/examples.

Very basic knowledge. Should be more in depth.

It's very good course

Vague

I didn't think it was possible to dislike finance more after taking a course designed for non-financial professionals. Clearly, I should have known more about finances before taking this class, and perhaps I would have liked it more. However, I left the course feeling more frustrated than ever.

I exptected a differente course. I am not related or interested at all on these topics neither personal nor professional.