Overall a good course. However, certain modules where quite difficult to follow and needed more breaking down of complicated processes.

The rating should be around 3.5 stars. You should give more importance on how to do systemic review and meta-analysis itself.

Thank you.

Concepts were often repeated many times and quiz questions were often too specific based on the general concepts covered in lectures.

A bit outdated but pretty useful for the basics, make sure to look for the updated version of the bibliography the course recommends.

Nice introduction to the topic and useful if you're considering and/or in the planning phases for conducting a systematic review

Very useful to put into place and frame up my previous experience on this matter! Thanks for making possible to benefit from it.

I learned alot on the basics of a systematic review, it is a great course. I look forward to conducting a systematic review.

A clear idea of what needs to be done in the conduction of systematic reviews and meta-analysis is provided in this course.

I would love to have some paragraphs to read in between videos for better catch up. Excellent effort, thorough explanation.

I enjoy it a lot, despite my formation as Marine biologist.

5 stars if it was present some links to a wider range of topics

The course need to be updated. Some of the information sounds outdated. Otherwise a great experience. Thank you so much.

Thank you very much for the course. It is a quite great and helpful introduction to meta-analysis subject. Best regards

Overall, the introduction was great, but some topics were not addressed, and important practical issues were left out.

The course is great as an introductory course to Meta-Analysis. I feel like I know a lot more about Meta-Analysis now.

The course is awesome and i learnt a lot ! Week 3-4 was a bit hard to understand but overall i enjoyed it very much !

Good introduction to conducting systematic reviews in general and a teaser for doing meta-analysis. I enjoyed it!

Sometimes there are typos in the text. I think the Pubmed slides need to be updated to what it looks like today.

It extensively covered points around SR and MA. Though I was hoping for more contents around numerical analysis.

I would urge to include course on developing forest plot in meta analysis or else include in the same course

difficult for the meta-analysis calculation part. Actually, I cannot understand most of the contents.Thanks.

Another module about working with RevMan or running meta-analysis in STATA would further enhance the course.

A useful introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Presentation could be improved somewhat.

All stages well explained, but some concepts were complicated and required multiply watches of lectures

It was great! Very informative but I wish the course offered more experience dealing with the subject.

it was a nice experience to learn a new skill. Sessions were clear n well explained.. Motivating too