Exceptional course for the beginner . There are lots of things cover.

some part related to Figma needs to be detailed and updated

great courses but need to be more practical.

This course is great and an eye opener

Obtained the new skills. Good overall.

Basic knowledge about ux/ui design

Excellent material for beginner!

Course was great

good course

Very good

good

good

Very interesting, I loved taking it. However some of the questions in quizzes were worded incorrectly and the way the content was organized was not great. Some sections were exceptionally long and could have been condensed, and grouped into better categories that made more sense.

This course was one of the best, if I recall it correctly, but in the big assessment I received bugged files and nobody helped me. Flagging, posting, writing to the support, nobody was in the mood to help me.

It had a lot of good information, but the final project required us to use a specific program, and with everything they were asking us to do I would have had to purchase the paid tier of the app.

The review on how to use Figma was too brief. I am still struggling with creating a wireframe after the course

The rating of the final project through others is a joke. People give random ratings.

not what i was expecting, just meeh

I'm a coder, not as designer.

Very old school

The purpose of the course (supposedly) is to teach something very visual, so relying on videos that just show someone talking for most of the video parts is not at all helpful. It's like they put the minimum effort in to get some money out of people.

I did not like the Figma instructions. I found them not very useful and unnecessarily long. I checked a couple of youtube videos and learned the whole thing in approx 2hrs.

Outdated lessons for Figma intro, poor quiz structure and content (Some question were incorrect).

You can learn how to use Figma, but it will not teach you to make designs

Peer grading from non professions in a UX field is dangerous. The assessment grade lowered my course grade. For instance, out of 2 graders one identified I had the personas photo on my journey map. If one saw it how did the other not? Also, on the low fidelity wireframe the graders agreed that there was a place to select times for dining, but in the high fidelity prototype only one said it was present. In UX the low fidelity wireframe is what tells your high fidelity what needs to be designed. It's the blueprint. So there was no way that should have been graded that way. Also, one out of two said there was no place to put the customers information, when in the low fidelity wireframe they both agreed there was. This is a nuisance to professionals who actually take this serious and deserve fair grading. They should be graded by other professionals. Thanks.