Great Course.

I have lear

good

well

Good

The course is alright if you are a very independent self-learner. I found the presentation to be very boring. It reminded me of the professors who simply stood motionless in from of the class and read the powerpoint and book word for word in a mono tone voice. My suggestion is to maybe find someone who is a bit more animated to present. There is a ton of good content and the real world application does appear in the final peer reviewed project. However, I found the prompt to be extremely confusing and so did my other fellow learners. The question asked to "interpret and comment" a graph of financial ratio's. Many of the submissions I reviewed were confused in the same way that I was. I figured out eventually that I was meant to explain the data as a financial analyst would to an executive, but I saw that 2 out of 3 of the assessments that I graded simply listed the calculation results with no interpretation or comment. I can see how this would be confusing language and it should be made more clear.

The course is good but assignment has error and if someone didn't pass the assignment in 3 attempts then you have to wait for 360 hrs. The result of that learners/students times wasted a lot to pass the course.

Assignment is only allowed for students who purchased the course. I don't think this is a way to encourage learning.

Good for learning how to calculate ratios and NPV. The course material doesn't explain the interpretation o

Just for fresh beginner in this topic

The problem is just the last Peer Gradeded Quiz.

More in-depth analysis would have been amazing.

Average!

Paul Kofmans accent is intolerable - If the course should work he would have to stop saying "F" everytime he should say "V" - iI´s highly disturbing constanstantly hearing "fan" instead "van", "infestors" instead of "investors" etc.

I completed the course and got the certificate

as well, still it charged me extra 45 euros. Coursera sucks

👎