DC
Jul 20, 2020
I thought it was a great intro coming from my Architecture background and looking forward to the other classes. I did think the information was occasionally repetitive but overall it had a great flow.
DG
Feb 19, 2021
This was a great experience. It gave the confidence to tackle such issues as Duration of Activity Schedules and many more. Learned a lot and course content will forever be my guide on future projects.
By Kartikey M
•Jul 14, 2020
best
By Mona A A
•Jun 7, 2020
GOOD
By Viraj P
•Feb 17, 2020
good
By Mounib r D
•Jan 31, 2020
Good
By Subin K
•Aug 4, 2019
Good
By S S K
•Oct 14, 2017
best
By Rafat A
•Sep 5, 2017
good
By Sowmya K
•Mar 19, 2017
Good
By vamsi n
•Nov 17, 2022
yes
By Stanislav H
•Apr 4, 2022
4/5
By Ahmad A
•Jul 24, 2019
Top
By Carlos D
•Sep 21, 2017
...
By Wendenmi C A A O
•Dec 15, 2024
95
By ALI B I S A
•Mar 19, 2023
ش
By Shrishail R
•Mar 25, 2022
it
By فاطمة م ا ع
•Dec 21, 2022
.
By MAHAMADYUSUF G
•Apr 5, 2022
o
By TITHI S
•Jan 10, 2022
.
By Ketaki I
•Dec 6, 2021
By Tamara L
•Apr 16, 2017
E
By Glen T
•Feb 27, 2020
The program is very complete, covering the essential aspects of this discipline as well as the history and future evolution anticipated through technology.
Opportunities for improvement:
-Better integration of all parts of the program: the more practical lessons lack the technological theories disclosed as "musts" by the lean construction models and BIM practices. In example, the great benefits of BIM mentioned in this program as far as job site logistics and safety are not mentioned in the lesson dedicated to logistics and safety planning. In a similar manner, the great advancements of Lean practices are not discussed by the professor who managed the reconstruction of the World Trade Center, one of the best practical teachings in the program.
-Better transcripts: some of the lessons have trade-related terminology errors that must be fixed ("ideal" labor meaning "idle" labor, etc.).
By Kyle W
•Apr 2, 2018
A very good course overall. I particularly enjoyed the unit on BIM, and the depth of the technical details presented. I would appreciate however that the transcripts were edited more carefully. It looks like some software simply converted the audio to text, which makes reading it very challenging. Personally, I am a visual learner - so I highly prefer reading text at my own pace instead of listening to the audio portion of the lectures. This was particularly difficult with some of the transcripts provided.
Also, I felt there was too much overlap in some of the presenters. This course could probably deliver the same information in 20% less time with some editing. Well done overall, I look forward to continuing my ongoing education with Coursera.
By Justyna W
•Jun 1, 2021
Some of the topics are very basics, some are only skimmed through. I hope they will be explored in detail in the later courses. It is useful to have previous construction sector knowledge as it helps to understand the course content. The major disadvantage is lack of ability to download notes we wrote during the course, which means it is difficult to come back to the study material, revise it or use it in practice at work. The course is very US-centric and lacks some references to the practices in Europe, Asia or the Middle East.
By MdSaif
•Aug 4, 2020
Construction Project Management (CPM) is a great course if one is beginning or wants to get into CPM. I learnt lot of nitty-gritty associated with trade. the course comprehensively highlights the importance of Risk assessment, even setting up canteen involves risk was clearly described. Basics of Work Breakdown structure, logical sequencing of tasks etc can be learned.
Thank you for curating such a course.