Lectures are awesome, really inspiring and intuitive.Trouble with submitting assignments. I've solved the given question and resubmitted for almost six times, but the kernels showing up errors.

Horrible user experience with the "Jupyter Hub" constant issues that makes trying to do the exams an absolute nightmare and a perfect anxiety booster!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In some tasks the delivery format is arbitrary and does not specify well what is wanted, that is, so the numerical value requested is good, the output is incorrect. due to format issues.

Not as good as the other courses in this specialization series. Specially, everything in week 4 has been rushed too much, with limited explanation of some of the most complex topics!

Programming part was not explained well. I guess programming syntax and flow of code should be explained too instead of just telling theory or focusing mainly on theory.

TOO MANY BUGS IN THE EXERCISES.It was a dis-incentive. Really.And I love me some deeplearning.ai! It has been great. The videos and content structure are fantastic.

Though the videos were very good but the assignments require too much from us and also there are few mistakes in week 3 and 4 notebooks which take a lot of time.

https://www.coursera.org/learn/convolutional-neural-networks/programming/IaknP/face-recognition-for-the-happy-house/discussions/threads/NcpP7i95EemJswr-eOHMNg

The content is excellent, but there were technical problems with the final homework assignment that were not addressed by staff in a timely manner.

Content was interestind and provided good theoretical overview. Exercices where you just have to fill in some line of codes are not usefull.

Some of the code was incorrect and the guidance was often confusing. Visibly worse than the other courses in the specialization,

Don't feel like I understand these models much better than before. Still don't see the logic of the identity layers

Lots of problem with the grader. Wasted a lot of time grappling with grader issues. Very disappointed.

The quality of some of the graders e.g. IOU is poor. One cannot make out what exactly is it checking

Disappointed by the quality of notebooks, which often disconnect and lose all the code you wrote.

The course assignment parts have many errors, I have to fix it myself. That's silly.

Good content, but quite a bit of technical work is needed to present this better.

for goodness sake "your didn't pass the test" isn't feedback for notebook grades

Dificultades en la hoja de tareas de Face Recognition que deberían solucionar

The content was good, as usual, but week 4's quiz was pretty buggy.

Good course but lots of technical issues with the assignments.

The notebooks were too simple. And the grader was not working.

Videos are good, but exercises are really confusing

content good, but assignment is in poor quality

The structure of the assignments is not good