DK
Sep 23, 2020
This course is good for engineers. It illustrated many fundemental and important concept in materials science. The teacher is great who explain nearly everthings in details with words and experiments.
ZM
Jul 17, 2017
This course is good for engineers. It illustrated many fundemental and important concept in materials science. The teacher is great who explain nearly everthings in details with words and experiments.
By Sajib K N
•Sep 7, 2020
This course will help to know the stress, strain,ductility,fatigue, semiconductor and any other topic. Also help to know the eutectic and eutectoid point.That will be help me go ahead in the engineering sector. My teacher also be great.The system of teaching process also interesting.
By Bryan H
•Dec 19, 2016
Good use of figures and graphs. I like the input of historical references to help understand the material. Lectures can be disengaging at times, the professor uses a lot of pauses which makes it hard to follow. Overall, it's a good introduction and overview to material science.
By Samet G
•Nov 27, 2017
This course consists of beneficial topics for all engineers. The topics are explained in briefly and the quizes contains the relavent terms about the topics. I hope to take the new courses about material science in Coursera.Thanks UC Davis and Mr James Shackelford.
By Jis N G
•Jul 23, 2020
Lectures by Prof.Shackelford is not very clear as it lacks details but his book is excellent.Places where he takes the lectures is also very good-just the right place that has applications of the subject.
By Bhaumik U P
•Dec 12, 2017
I would say that the lectures delivered by the Prof. James were not loud and clear as he was taking so many pauses in between the speech. Else, the material data illustrated was good !
By Padraig C
•Jul 15, 2017
Very informative course but professor Shackleford was quite sterile and unengaging. He also tended to brush over things without explaining them
By Ahmad J A
•Jun 30, 2021
it is not bad, but the course should be more detailed, the more information that have been obtained the better.
By Ramesh K
•Apr 22, 2020
content is good but more number of experiments need to be added to understand the concepts clearly.
By Mike B
•Jul 11, 2023
A lot of the answers on the tests are incorrect per data from other institutions.
By Istiak U S
•Jul 3, 2020
Poorly designed course. But has some great information with a good explanation.
By muhamed m e
•Jan 29, 2017
It's good but depend only save informations than understand it
By Anthony S
•Nov 19, 2017
Not what I thought, but a good introduction to the material.
By Arup D
•Apr 22, 2020
Poorly Designed course. Not much information to understand.
By Frankie L
•Oct 7, 2017
More in depth explanations w have was omitted.
By Kishor S
•Mar 22, 2019
Though good but less content.
By Chinmay J
•Sep 20, 2019
Basic introductory course
By RAJAT S
•Jun 20, 2020
Please add more content.
By Marcin G
•Aug 15, 2017
It was OK, I guess...
By Rushikesh K J
•May 27, 2020
Nice coures
By smit p
•Dec 18, 2020
Good
By John M D
•Nov 16, 2023
The lectures were not all at the introductory level. Most of the explanations seemed to be the Professor circling and underlining parts of charts or formulas while reciting basic definitions, rather than going into examples or more in-depth explanations. I found myself going to youtube on several topics for better understanding.
By Ramnath S K
•Jun 27, 2016
I was disappointed with the treatment of the main concepts. They were cursorily dealt with. Examples from the real world and a more graphic explanation esp. of the crystal defects would have helped. Otherwise, all the main points were covered.
By Girish P
•May 21, 2020
Please explain topic in more effective manner. Professor not focus on the basic concepts. Without pre knowledge you cannot clear it.
By Abdelrahman s d
•Dec 11, 2021
Small content, low details, and boring explanation
By Dr.Sudheer R
•May 23, 2020
Very slow and dull narration.