Chevron Left
Back to Evaluations of AI Applications in Healthcare

Learner Reviews & Feedback for Evaluations of AI Applications in Healthcare by Stanford University

4.5
stars
256 ratings

About the Course

With artificial intelligence applications proliferating throughout the healthcare system, stakeholders are faced with both opportunities and challenges of these evolving technologies. This course explores the principles of AI deployment in healthcare and the framework used to evaluate downstream effects of AI healthcare solutions. In support of improving patient care, Stanford Medicine is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team. Visit the FAQs below for important information regarding 1) Date of the original release and expiration date; 2) Accreditation and Credit Designation statements; 3) Disclosure of financial relationships for every person in control of activity content....

Top reviews

JW

Apr 7, 2022

This course was really valuable for linking and embedding my knowledge gained by reading FDA guidance documents and knowledge sharing from my Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs colleagues

GL

Mar 5, 2021

This is a holistic course giving all perspectives and knowledge on the different aspects of evaluating all kind of AI driven solutions in healthcare. A must do for all healthcare Managers.

Filter by:

51 - 60 of 60 Reviews for Evaluations of AI Applications in Healthcare

By Javier B

•

Oct 13, 2024

DEMASIADO TIEMPO HABLANDO DE SESGO, JUSTICIA Y EQUIDAD. EL RESTO PERFECTO.

By Pierre J

•

Jul 10, 2022

Useful content, but there is a lot of repetition early in the course.

By Shiraz T

•

Dec 24, 2023

good source of information

By Richard J

•

Apr 7, 2021

Excellent

By zoi k

•

Nov 15, 2023

the content was really interesting, but it seemed it the way it was given was not interactive, it was just like "reading slides" and the videos had flaws at some points (glitches). Not a good impression when the last chapter was just text, not including videos

By Petra H

•

Jan 16, 2024

Material was useful and described in depth. The English text transcription of the presentation however contained many errors and poor grammar, making the transcript confusing at times.

By Yuanqin M

•

Jan 21, 2021

too many theories but no practica examples or exercises

By Francesca M B

•

Jan 8, 2022

Very US focused

By Julian M H

•

Sep 14, 2024

Repetion of the same information over and over. Lecturer only reads information. Lack of Reflection.

By Trinh D D ( H

•

Jul 14, 2023

very disappointed with week 7