Chevron Left
Back to SQL for Data Science

Learner Reviews & Feedback for SQL for Data Science by University of California, Davis

4.6
stars
16,647 ratings

About the Course

As data collection has increased exponentially, so has the need for people skilled at using and interacting with data; to be able to think critically,
and provide insights to make better decisions and optimize their businesses. This is a data scientist, “part mathematician, part computer
scientist, and part trend spotter” (SAS Institute, Inc.). According to Glassdoor, being a data scientist is the best job in America; with a median
base salary of $110,000 and thousands of job openings at a time. The skills necessary to be a good data scientist include being able to retrieve
and work with data, and to do that you need to be well versed in SQL, the standard language for communicating with databa...
...

Top reviews

AL

Aug 21, 2020

A comprehensive course that covers major aspects of query building and retrieval in a management system. The topics were delivered well and the materials/assignments were relevant for skill-building.

AT

Nov 17, 2020

Well it was a short course, the assignments are a little bit repetitive (mostly in the last). The course reviews every 'practical' aspects of SQL, how to assemble the bricks while writing queries,...

Filter by:

4076 - 4100 of 4,305 Reviews for SQL for Data Science

By Hunter G

Mar 11, 2023

The peer review part is BS and time consuming.

By Hari G

Dec 11, 2019

Too much theory and very little or no practice

By Benji W

Apr 7, 2023

Good information, but delivery was not great

By Muhammad A K

Nov 30, 2022

Vary basic course on SQL and Data Science.

By Shahzaib R

Jun 30, 2024

not well explained, thank god i have GPT

By Oleg E

Aug 14, 2022

Сокурскники ставят слишком низкие оценки

By K.Senthil R

Feb 16, 2024

Need more practical rather than theory.

By Deleted A

Jul 5, 2021

The course is basically theoretical.

By Yang Y

Jul 18, 2024

The course content is very limited.

By dager6

May 4, 2018

Good general basic introductions.

By Tong Z

Dec 26, 2021

do not like the peer review part

By Gaoge Z

Jan 4, 2021

Could show results in demos.

By Preety R

Aug 21, 2023

Not explaining in depth

By Fabian M

Mar 16, 2021

Too little practice

By William J G

Jun 4, 2022

good but dated

By Md: A H

Oct 25, 2023

nice course

By Renuka G

Dec 20, 2019

good one

By Ravikumar C

Feb 2, 2023

good

By 318126512050 S R B

Jun 21, 2021

good

By Carl D A

Aug 13, 2020

good

By Krishna G

Jun 10, 2020

good

By Chen G

Feb 15, 2019

Soso

By Gergely H

Jul 30, 2021

Y

By renas c

Mar 12, 2021

.

By Manas d

Sep 19, 2020

.