The course content is of high quality and it would not be trevial even for people with a background in computer science and machine learning. The course works are very well defined, structured and clear. The only thing I guess could be improved is the way that content is delivered by the instructors. Overall, I do recommend taking this course to people who want to start exploring RL or who wants to gain better proficiency in Python programming for RL.

The course is overall very good: lectures are very clear, quizzes are challenging and the course relies on a text book, provided when you enroll. The only weak point, but not a serious issue, is that most of the lectures do not add content to what is in the book. Since studying the book is in fact mandatory, they could have used the lectures to better explain some concepts, assuming people read the book. Sometimes they do, but not so often.

Lectures were good, but not as intuition building as in the first course. The biggest strength of this course is that it follows a good textbook and expects you to read it. Quizzes and programming assignments are good for learning, but all the programming assignments are very scripted/guided. As a result, I think that it would be very easy to finish this course and still not be able to set up a sample-based learning model on your own.

A very thorough and well-designed course. It covers almost all important topics of tabular methods of Reinforcement Learning and follows the RL textbook very well. The only imperfectness of this course is the way instructors explaining the concepts. It is obvious that the instructors are reading off the scripts and not particularly explaining with their own words, which makes the lecture part less comprehensible.

This course series is an incredible introduction to the basics of reinforcement learning, full stop. The course ... style, if you will, is a bit weird at first, but it seems to have been done on purpose with the aim of making the course somewhat timeless; they are presenting maths that will not change, in a format that will (hilariously) be no more slightly corny and weird in 2030 as it is in 2019.

The course includes very clear explanation of sample_based learning methods. However, if the program assignment can include more detail explanation per steps, it will help students quickly realize what they are going to implement. In addition, an clear content page that shows the purpose of each cell at the beginning of the assignment can help students understand whole structure of the code.

A very good course. The lectures are brief and provide a quick overview of the topics. The quizzes require more in-depth reading to pass (covering material not discussed in the lectures) and the projects are difficult but rewarding and really help to cement the information. My only suggestion would be to lengthen the lectures to provide more discussion on the topics.

Excellent, however, one or two of the coding assignments had stricter requirements on implementation that I expected so my optimisations turned into "optimisations". Functionally same, but costly to debug.

Otherwise excellent content that covers the Sutton Barto book in a very easy to understand way. They should write a book on the topic, in fact!

Overall, I found the course well made, inspiring and balanced. The videos really helped me to understand the rather austere textbook. I give 4 stars because some of the coding exercises felt more like work in progress, without the help of other students I would not have been able to overcome these issues.

I like the structure of the course and it is in general well done. However, the programming assignment system is occasionally difficult to work with. I would suggest that the lectures be a little longer and a little more details, going into the nuts and bolts of how the algorithms work.

Overall I think the course is great. However, I wish the quizzes had less of the 'select all that are true' because if you miss one then you get a 0 for the whole question. Also, the variable names would change between programming assignments, ex. self.discount switching to self.gamma.

Jump for here to there, it's nice to have all these algorithms. My gut tells me something is not correct. Too much focus on experience, which means a lot of data. The model part is touched very little, and main focus is on when model is wrong.....

Mid way thru my course in week 5, Jupyter notebooks were revised. In general, new ones are better but lost valuable forum discussion Still one error in plot of notebook of week 5th. But in general course was good

There was one bug with the blackjack exercise. The Dyna-Q and Dyna-Q+ exercises were quite challenging. Overall, it is possible to complete the module without understanding what's going on. Pay attention!!!

This is a very good course, the only thing to improve are the technical issues with the assignments and submission processes. I had problems on the half of the assignments and many others learners too.

It's an important course in understanding the working of reinforcement learning. Although some important and complex topics are not explored in this course which are mentioned in the textbook.

This course excellent, my only complaint is that there is a 5 attempts limits and a 4 months wait to retry. It seems excesive to me and adds extra pressure when taking on assignments.

It was a good course, but I was expecting more explanation on the subjects in the book. For example

Prioritized Sweeping was missing and the videos are not instructive enough.

Overall a very nice course, well explained and presented.

Sometimes, it would be nice to see the slides 'full screen' rather than the small version in the corner.

I

t

w

a

s

g

o

o

d

i

n

s

u

b

s

t

a

n

e but there is plenty of issues with the automated grader. you spend most time dealing with the letter not on actual learning of the matter.

Programming assignments are not as good as andrew ng's courses. But still they are good enough to help you understand the concepts better by coding them

The lectures and quiz tests are perfect. Jupyter. Programming exercises can be a little confusing sometimes but are also great. A great course, overall.

definitely interesting subjects, but I do not like the teaching method. Very mechanic and dull, with not enough connection to the real world

Everything is great overall but It would be more better if DynaQ & DynaQ+ were explained more detail in the lecture instead of assignment.

Pretty clear explanations! Nice starting point if you want to deep dive into RL. It gives clear picture over some confusing terms in RL.